Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 24, 2025

Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Cardiogenic Shock From Heart Failure Versus Acute Myocardial Infarction: Clinical Characteristics, Hospital Course,
Shashank S Sinha1, Carolyn M Rosner1, Behnam N Tehrani1
1Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA (S.S.S., C.M.R., B.N.T., A.G.T., A.A.D., M.D., S.S.D., K.C.E., C.d., M.C.F., L.G., H.M., J.J.P., M.A.P., A.R., P.S., M.W.S., R.S., D.T., K.D.Y., T.W., C.M.O., W.B.B.).
Patients with heart failure-related cardiogenic shock (HF-CS) were younger and had lower mortality rates than those with acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS). Both groups experienced similar high rates of readmission and adverse events, requiring close long-term monitoring.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Critical Care Medicine
- Health Outcomes Research
Background:
- Clinical characteristics and outcomes of heart failure-related cardiogenic shock (HF-CS) are poorly understood compared to acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS).
- Understanding these differences is crucial for optimizing patient care and improving prognoses in cardiogenic shock.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the clinical features, hospital course, and 1-year outcomes of patients with HF-CS versus AMI-CS.
- To identify disparities in treatment and survival between these two patient populations.
Main Methods:
- A single-center registry study included 520 consecutive patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) from January 2017 to December 2019.
- In-hospital and 1-year outcomes were analyzed, comparing patients with HF-CS (n=301) to those with AMI-CS (n=219).
Main Results:
- HF-CS patients were younger, utilized fewer vasopressors, and had lower in-hospital mortality (23.9% vs 39.3%) compared to AMI-CS patients.
- Despite lower mortality, HF-CS patients had similar 30-day readmission rates and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) post-discharge.
- 1-year mortality was significantly lower in HF-CS patients (42.6%) than in AMI-CS patients (52.9%).
Conclusions:
- Patients with HF-CS present differently and have better in-hospital and 1-year survival than those with AMI-CS.
- Both HF-CS and AMI-CS cohorts face substantial risks for adverse events and readmissions, necessitating comprehensive long-term follow-up strategies.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure I: Introduction

