Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.

Behaviorism

Behaviorism

The field of behaviorism was pioneered by figures such as Ivan Pavlov, John B. Watson, and B.F. Skinner fundamentally shifted the focus of psychology to the observable and controllable aspects of human and animal behavior. This shift marked a critical evolution in the discipline, emphasizing scientific rigor and experimental methodology.
The core premise of behaviorism is its focus on observable behavior rather than internal thoughts or feelings. This approach argues that true scientific...

Behavioral Genetics and Its Designs

Behavioral Genetics and Its Designs

Behavior genetics explores how genetic inheritance influences human behavior. It focuses on how genes, passed from parents to offspring, contribute to the development of behavioral traits and tendencies. This branch of genetics seeks to understand the complex interplay between inherited genetic factors and environmental influences in shaping our behaviors.
The primary methodologies used in behavior genetics include family studies, twin studies, and adoption studies, each providing unique...

The Scientific Method

The Scientific Method

Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.

Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory

Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory

Correspondent inference theory, proposed by Jones and Davis in 1965, seeks to explain how individuals infer stable personality traits from observed behaviors. It suggests that people attribute actions to underlying dispositions rather than external circumstances, particularly when the behavior appears intentional and socially significant.Voluntary Behavior and Dispositional AttributionAccording to this theory, individuals are more likely to attribute behavior to personal traits when it appears...

Behavior Modification

Behavior Modification

Behavioral approaches have often been criticized for ignoring mental processes and focusing solely on observable behavior. However, these approaches provide an optimistic perspective for individuals seeking to change their behaviors. Rather than concentrating on intrinsic personality traits, behavioral approaches suggest that even longstanding habits can be modified by changing the reward contingencies that maintain them.
A real-world application of operant conditioning principles is applied...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Functional brain organization is stable within individuals across years.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same author

Objective quality assessment for precision functional MRI data.

Neuron·2026

Same author

An open, fully-processed data resource for studying mood and sleep variability in the developing brain.

Aperture neuro·2026

Same author

Patterns of brain-wide associations reflect socioeconomics.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026

Same author

Robust lesion network mapping reveals genuine symptom-specific networks.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same author

Functional brain network correlates of pubertal timing and depressive symptoms in preadolescence.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same journal

Dynamic coordination and segregation mechanisms in higher cortex for parallel task processing.

Neuron·2026

Same journal

Higher-order thalamic bursts are drivers of attention control.

Neuron·2026

Same journal

Composing trajectories for rapid inference of navigational goals.

Neuron·2026

Same journal

Peri-head distance coding in the mouse brainstem.

Neuron·2026

Same journal

A two-timepoint framework for sensitive and specific single-cell activity screening.

Neuron·2026

Same journal

From first impressions to bonds: The neural dynamics of social relationships.

Neuron·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 24, 2025

Boldness, Aggression, and Shoaling Assays for Zebrafish Behavioral Syndromes

Boldness, Aggression, and Shoaling Assays for Zebrafish Behavioral Syndromes

Published on: August 29, 2016

Brain-behavior correlations: Two paths toward reliability.

Caterina Gratton¹, Steven M Nelson², Evan M Gordon³

¹Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA; Department of Neurology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.

|May 5, 2022

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Cross-sectional brain-behavior correlations in human neuroscience are often small and unreliable. Researchers must prioritize large sample sizes or focused investigations to ensure robust findings.

More Related Videos

Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction

Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction

Published on: February 26, 2014

Detecting Behavioral Deficits in Rats After Traumatic Brain Injury

Detecting Behavioral Deficits in Rats After Traumatic Brain Injury

Published on: January 30, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 24, 2025

Boldness, Aggression, and Shoaling Assays for Zebrafish Behavioral Syndromes

Boldness, Aggression, and Shoaling Assays for Zebrafish Behavioral Syndromes

Published on: August 29, 2016

Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction

Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction

Published on: February 26, 2014

Detecting Behavioral Deficits in Rats After Traumatic Brain Injury

Detecting Behavioral Deficits in Rats After Traumatic Brain Injury

Published on: January 30, 2018

Area of Science:

Neuroscience
Cognitive Science
Psychology

Background:

Cross-sectional brain-behavior correlations are fundamental in human neuroscience research.
Previous studies often relied on smaller sample sizes, potentially leading to unreliable findings.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate the reliability of cross-sectional brain-behavior correlations.
To guide future human neuroscience study designs.

Main Methods:

Analysis of existing brain-behavior correlation data.
Statistical assessment of effect sizes and sample size requirements.

Main Results:

Demonstrated that brain-behavior correlations are frequently small and unreliable without large sample sizes.
Highlighted the impact of sample size on the statistical power and reproducibility of findings.

Conclusions:

Human neuroscience must adapt study designs to address the challenge of small, unreliable effects.
Future research should focus on either maximizing sample sizes or employing focused investigations to enhance effect sizes and ensure reliable results.