Determinants of success associated with vacuum bell treatment of pectus excavatum

We explored determinants of success in a large cohort of patients with pectus excavatum submitted to vacuum bell treatment and compared groups with satisfactory versus unsatisfactory outcomes.

Retrospective case-control study in a single center between May 2013 and January 2020, including patients with pectus excavatum treated with vacuum bell. We classified patients according to their status at closure of data registry (surveillance; withdrawal; complete correction; failure) and according to Obermeyer's classification of degrees of pectus excavatum correction. Determinants of success were calculated using receiver operating characteristic curves.

Overall, 186 patients were included. Complete correction was achieved by 17% of the cases, while 45% remained under surveillance. Failure rates were low (n = 9; 5%), whereas withdrawal rates were 34%. Based on Obermeyer's classification of degree of excavation correction, 35% had excellent/good, 25% fair, and 40% poor/worse results. When comparing patients with good/excellent results with those with unsatisfactory results, patients with good/excellent results had a longer treatment duration [19.0 (13.0; 28) months vs. 13.0 (6.5; 22.5) months, p<0.0001], and lower initial pectus depth [1.6 (1.2; 2.0) cm, vs. 2.0 (1.5; 2.6) cm, p = 0.001]. Using ROC curves, the best determinants of success were an initial pectus depth ≤ 1.8 cm and a length of treatment > 12 months.

One-third of patients in treatment with a vacuum bell achieved excellent or good outcomes in our cohort. Determinants of success included an initial pectus depth of 1.8 cm or less and a minimum length of treatment of 12 months.

retrospective comparative study LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.