Recipient-surgeon racial concordance in orthotopic heart transplantation outcomes

Prior studies have demonstrated deleterious outcomes for physician-patient racial discordance. We explored recipient-surgeon racial concordance and short-term postoperative survival in adults undergoing orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT).

The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database was queried to identify White and Black adult (≥18 years) patients undergoing isolated OHT between 2000 and 2020. Surgeon race was obtained from publicly available images. All non-White and non-Black recipients and surgeons were excluded. Linear probability models were utilized to explore the relationship between recipient-surgeon racial concordance and 30-, 60-, and 90-day post-transplant mortality using a fixed effects approach.

A total of 26,133 recipients were identified (mean age 52.79 years, 74.4% male) with 77.65% (n = 20,292) being White and 22.35% (n = 5841) being Black. A total of 662 White surgeons performed 25,946 (97.56%) OHTs during the study period while 17 Black surgeons performed 437 (1.67%) OHTs. Although some evidence of differences across groups was observed in cross-tabular specifications, these differences became insignificant after the inclusion of controls (i.e., comorbidities and fixed effects). This suggests that recipient race and physician race are not correlated with post-OHT survival at 30, 60, or 90 days.

Recipient-surgeon racial concordance and discordance among adults undergoing OHT do not appear to impact post-transplant survival. Nor do we observe significant penalties accruing for Black patients overall once controls are accounted for. Given that worse outcomes have historically been demonstrated for Black patients undergoing OHT, further work will be necessary to improve understanding of racial disparities for patients with end-stage heart failure.