Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

6.6K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
6.6K
Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

7.2K
An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a  sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval  contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A...
7.2K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

4.9K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
4.9K
Margin of Error01:27

Margin of Error

4.6K
The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
4.6K
Confidence Coefficient01:24

Confidence Coefficient

7.9K
The confidence coefficient is also known as the confidence level or degree of confidence. It is the percent expression for the probability, 1-α, that the confidence interval contains the true population parameter assuming that the confidence interval is obtained after sufficient unbiased sampling; for example, if the CL = 90%, then in 90 out of 100 samples the interval estimate will enclose the true population parameter. Here α is the area under the curve, distributed equally under...
7.9K
Finding Critical Values for Chi-Square01:18

Finding Critical Values for Chi-Square

3.2K
Consider a curve representing sample data drawn randomly from a normally distributed population. One must construct confidence intervals to estimate or to test a claim regarding the population standard deviation. For example, a 95% confidence interval covers 95% of the area under the curve, and the remaining 5% is equally distributed on either side of the curve. To achieve such confidence intervals, one must determine the critical values. The critical values are simply the values separating the...
3.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Some teaching resources using R with illustrative examples exploring COVID-19 data.

Teaching statistics·2024
Same author

Awareness and interest in osteopathic manipulative treatment in allopathic medical students.

Journal of osteopathic medicine·2023
Same author

Mental Health Screening in Pediatric Primary Care: Factors Associated With Screening Completion and Elevated Scores.

Clinical pediatrics·2022
Same author

Targeting WEE1/AKT Restores p53-Dependent Natural Killer-Cell Activation to Induce Immune Checkpoint Blockade Responses in "Cold" Melanoma.

Cancer immunology research·2022
Same author

Clinical Indoor Running Gait Analysis May Not Approximate Outdoor Running Gait Based on Novel Drone Technology.

Sports health·2021
Same author

Assessing the impact of COVID-19 on registered interventional clinical trials.

Clinical and translational science·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 24, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K

Exact-corrected confidence interval for risk difference in noninferiority binomial trials.

Nour Hawila1, Arthur Berg1

  • 1Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, College of Medicine, Penn State University, Pennsylvania, USA.

Biometrics
|May 8, 2022
PubMed
Summary

A new confidence interval method for noninferiority binomial trials offers better power, especially with small sample sizes. This approach ensures type-I error control and improves upon existing methods for risk difference estimation.

Keywords:
confidence interval estimationexact testnoninferiority clinical trial

More Related Videos

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness
07:37

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness

Published on: August 1, 2017

9.3K
E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
06:28

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

Published on: August 1, 2019

8.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 24, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K
Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness
07:37

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness

Published on: August 1, 2017

9.3K
E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
06:28

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

Published on: August 1, 2019

8.4K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trials
  • Statistical Inference

Background:

  • Noninferiority trials are crucial for demonstrating that a new treatment is not worse than a standard one.
  • Accurate estimation of the risk difference and its confidence interval is essential for decision-making in these trials.
  • Existing confidence interval estimators may lack sufficient power, particularly in scenarios with limited sample sizes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a novel confidence interval estimator for the risk difference in binomial noninferiority trials.
  • To develop a method that is consistent with an exact unconditional test preserving type-I error.
  • To improve statistical power compared to existing methods, especially for smaller sample sizes.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a new confidence interval estimator for the risk difference.
  • Ensuring consistency with an exact unconditional hypothesis test.
  • Theoretical justification and validation through simulations and real-world examples.
  • Implementation of the proposed method in an R package.

Main Results:

  • The proposed confidence interval demonstrates improved power compared to the Chan and Zhang interval.
  • The method effectively preserves type-I error rates.
  • Enhanced performance is particularly notable in trials with smaller sample sizes.
  • The R package provides a practical tool for applying the new methodology.

Conclusions:

  • The novel confidence interval estimator offers a statistically sound and more powerful alternative for risk difference analysis in noninferiority binomial trials.
  • The proposed method provides a valuable tool for researchers, enhancing the precision of treatment comparisons.
  • Availability of an R package facilitates the adoption and application of these advanced statistical techniques.