Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cognitive Dissonance01:38

Cognitive Dissonance

33.9K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
33.9K
Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

4.7K
When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
4.7K
Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?01:17

Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?

28.4K
The outcome of any hypothesis testing leads to rejecting or not rejecting the null hypothesis. This decision is taken based on the analysis of the data, an appropriate test statistic, an appropriate confidence level, the critical values, and P-values. However, when the evidence suggests that the null hypothesis cannot be rejected, is it right to say, 'Accept' the null hypothesis?
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null...
28.4K
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory01:29

Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory

12
Attribution theory plays a crucial role in social psychology, helping to explain how individuals interpret the causes of behavior. One prominent model within this field is Harold Kelley's covariation theory, which provides a systematic approach to determining whether internal traits or external circumstances drive a person's actions. The model posits that individuals rely on three key types of information—consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness—to make these judgments.Consensus:...
12
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

7.3K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
7.3K
Shearing Stresses in a Beam: Problem Solving01:14

Shearing Stresses in a Beam: Problem Solving

318
A cantilever beam with a rectangular cross-section under distributed and point loads experiences shearing stresses. The analysis begins by identifying the loads acting on the beam. Then, the reactions at the beam's fixed end are calculated using equilibrium equations. The vertical reaction is a combination of the distributed and point loads, while the moment reaction is the sum of their moments. The shear force distribution along the beam, resulting from these loads, is established by...
318

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

How to use freedom of information request data for nursing research.

Evidence-based nursing·2026
Same author

Correspondence on "defining 'abortion'": response to Sakr.

Theoretical medicine and bioethics·2026
Same author

Registers and quotas: strengthening conscientious objection policy in healthcare.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same author

Abortion and Infant Mortality: Termination Does Not Prevent Death.

The New bioethics : a multidisciplinary journal of biotechnology and the body·2026
Same author

Reconsidering the impairment argument against abortion.

Theoretical medicine and bioethics·2025
Same author

Clearing the air on surgical smoke: Why National Health Service trusts must act.

Journal of perioperative practice·2025
Same journal

Pilgrimage, faithful secularity, and the commodification of the vulnerable body.

The New bioethics : a multidisciplinary journal of biotechnology and the body·2026
Same journal

Victimhood Without Personhood.

The New bioethics : a multidisciplinary journal of biotechnology and the body·2026
Same journal

Ethical challenges of using artificial intelligence in suicide prevention: a literature review.

The New bioethics : a multidisciplinary journal of biotechnology and the body·2026
Same journal

On Making a Success of Life: 'Human Flourishing' and Healthcare.

The New bioethics : a multidisciplinary journal of biotechnology and the body·2026
Same journal

OnlyFans and Deep Fake Porn - Can We Accept the Former but Condemn the Latter?

The New bioethics : a multidisciplinary journal of biotechnology and the body·2026
Same journal

Patient as Citizen: Pluralism, Persuasion, and Liberal Politics.

The New bioethics : a multidisciplinary journal of biotechnology and the body·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 24, 2025

Author Spotlight: Methodologies and Advancements of Chronic Pain Management Research
08:33

Author Spotlight: Methodologies and Advancements of Chronic Pain Management Research

Published on: January 5, 2024

1.3K

Why inconsistency arguments fail: a response to Shaw.

Bruce P Blackshaw1, Nicholas Colgrove2, Daniel Rodger3

  • 1Philosophy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

The New Bioethics : a Multidisciplinary Journal of Biotechnology and the Body
|May 9, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study examines arguments questioning the consistency of abortion opponents. The authors refine their objections, asserting that initial criticisms largely hold against current inconsistency arguments, despite counterarguments.

Keywords:
Embryosabortioninconsistency argumentsprolife

More Related Videos

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
12:12

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

10.7K
A Coupled Experiment-finite Element Modeling Methodology for Assessing High Strain Rate Mechanical Response of Soft Biomaterials
11:28

A Coupled Experiment-finite Element Modeling Methodology for Assessing High Strain Rate Mechanical Response of Soft Biomaterials

Published on: May 18, 2015

12.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 24, 2025

Author Spotlight: Methodologies and Advancements of Chronic Pain Management Research
08:33

Author Spotlight: Methodologies and Advancements of Chronic Pain Management Research

Published on: January 5, 2024

1.3K
Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
12:12

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

10.7K
A Coupled Experiment-finite Element Modeling Methodology for Assessing High Strain Rate Mechanical Response of Soft Biomaterials
11:28

A Coupled Experiment-finite Element Modeling Methodology for Assessing High Strain Rate Mechanical Response of Soft Biomaterials

Published on: May 18, 2015

12.6K

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Moral Philosophy
  • Reproductive Rights

Background:

  • Opponents of abortion often face accusations of inconsistency regarding the prevention of embryo and fetus deaths from non-induced abortion causes.
  • Previous 'inconsistency arguments' have been presented as susceptible to numerous objections and broadly unsuccessful.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address Joshua Shaw's critique of previous objections to inconsistency arguments.
  • To present an improved structure for inconsistency arguments, incorporating elements of Shaw's formulation.
  • To re-evaluate the validity of initial objections against current inconsistency arguments.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of 'inconsistency arguments' against abortion opponents.
  • Engagement with and critique of Joshua Shaw's reformulation of inconsistency arguments.
  • Development of an improved inconsistency argument structure based on critical evaluation.

Main Results:

  • The authors maintain that their initial objections to inconsistency arguments remain largely effective.
  • While acknowledging Shaw's points on examining arguments individually, the authors refute claims of misrepresentation.
  • An improved inconsistency argument structure is proposed, building upon critical engagement with counterarguments.

Conclusions:

  • The authors' initial objections to inconsistency arguments are largely upheld, even after considering Shaw's critique.
  • Inconsistency arguments require careful examination on a case-by-case basis.
  • The effectiveness of objections to inconsistency arguments in bioethical and philosophical discourse is reaffirmed.