Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 24, 2025

09:53
Role of Diffusion MRI Tractography in Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Surgery
Published on: July 5, 2021
3.8K
Outcomes after definitive treatment for head and neck angiosarcoma
Nina Irawati1, Alireza Moghadam2, Muzib Abdul-Razak2
1Sydney Head and Neck Cancer Institute, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, Australia.
ANZ Journal of Surgery
|May 9, 2022
Summary
This study reports on head and neck angiosarcoma (HN-AS) in Australia, finding surgery with adjuvant therapy improves survival outcomes compared to chemoradiotherapy alone for this rare cancer.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Head and Neck Cancer Research
- Rare Malignancies
Background:
- Head and neck angiosarcoma (HN-AS) is a rare (<1%) and aggressive malignancy.
- HN-AS is associated with high recurrence rates and poor 5-year survival (10-54%).
- Limited Australian data exists for this specific cancer type.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of HN-AS patients in Australia.
- To analyze survival data and identify prognostic factors for HN-AS.
- To provide the first Australian report on HN-AS treatment and outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective chart review of 26 HN-AS patients from two Australian high-volume head and neck cancer units.
- Analysis of patient demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment modalities, and survival outcomes (Overall Survival, Disease-Free Survival).
- Statistical comparison of outcomes based on treatment approaches (surgery + adjuvant vs. chemoradiotherapy).
Main Results:
- The cohort comprised predominantly male patients (81%) with a mean age of 77. Scalp was the most common primary site (62%).
- Five-year Overall Survival (OS) and Disease-Free Survival (DFS) were 41% and 15%, respectively.
- Patients treated with upfront surgery and adjuvant therapy demonstrated significantly better OS and DFS compared to those receiving upfront chemoradiotherapy (P=0.011 for OS, P=0.001 for DFS). Recurrence was observed in 57.7% of patients, with lung metastasis being common (80%).
Conclusions:
- This study represents the first Australian report on HN-AS treatment and outcomes.
- HN-AS is confirmed as a slowly progressive disease with poor survival rates.
- Upfront surgery followed by adjuvant therapy appears to yield better outcomes than chemoradiotherapy alone for HN-AS. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy's role requires further investigation.
