Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 23, 2025

Quantified Assessment of Infant's Gross Motor Abilities Using a Multisensor Wearable
Published on: May 17, 2024
Canadian and Brazilian Percentile Ranks for the Alberta Infant Motor Scale
Natália Alves Menegol1, Dayane Montemezzo1, Anilsa Suraya Gaspar Francisco Gulonda1
1Department of Physical Therapy, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.
Insights
Brazilian infants show different motor development percentile ranks compared to Canadian norms using the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS). These variations impact identifying developmental milestones.
Area of Science:
- Pediatrics
- Developmental Pediatrics
- Motor Development
Background:
- The Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) is a widely used tool for assessing infant motor development.
- Established norms are crucial for accurate interpretation of developmental assessments.
- Previous research has not extensively compared AIMS percentile ranks between Brazilian and Canadian infant populations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate differences in AIMS percentile ranks between Brazilian infants and established Canadian norms.
- To compare AIMS percentile ranks derived from different Brazilian normative studies.
- To assess the potential impact of these differences on the identification of motor development in Brazilian infants.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional study involving 322 Brazilian infants aged 2 to 15 months.
- Administration of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS).
- Calculation and comparison of percentile ranks using Canadian norms and two Brazilian normative datasets, employing Friedman test, interclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and Bland Altman analysis.
Main Results:
- Significant differences (p<.001) were found between the three sets of percentile ranks analyzed.
- Canadian norms yielded the lowest average AIMS scores for the Brazilian sample.
- While reliability between percentile ranks was good (ICC > 0.75), agreement was low (Bland Altman; p<.001).
Conclusions:
- There are statistically significant differences between AIMS percentile ranks for Brazilian infants when compared to Canadian norms.
- Discrepancies also exist between different Brazilian normative data sets for the AIMS.
- These variations underscore the importance of using appropriate, culturally relevant norms to accurately identify motor development in infants.
Abstract:
Aim: To verify if there is a difference between the percentile ranks for Brazilian infants compared with norms for Canadian infants on the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS). Method: A cross-sectional study in which 322 Brazilian infants, 2 to 15 months old, were administered the AIMS. Percentile ranks were calculated using norms for Canadian infants and norms from two studies of Brazilian infants. The Friedman test compared the AIMS percentile ranks for the entire sample. For reliability analysis, the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used. Bland Altman's analysis was applied to compare percentile ranks. Results: Of the 322 evaluations analyzed, there were significant differences (p<.001) between the three percentile ranks compared. The Canadian norms presented the lowest average rating. There was good reliability between the percentile ranks (ICC > 0.75) but low agreement (Bland Altman; p<.001). Conclusion: There are differences between the Brazilian and Canadian percentile ranks and between the Brazilian percentile ranks of 2014 and 2016, and these differences may influence identification of motor development.
Related Concept Videos
Percentile
z Scores and Area Under the Curve
Quartile
1; 1; 2; 2; 4; 6; 6.8; 7.2; 8; 8.3; 9; 10; 10; 11.5
The median or second quartile is seven. The lower half of the...
Percentage Frequency Distribution
The process of making a percentage frequency distribution involves the following few steps: note the total number of observations;...
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...

