Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 23, 2025

03:25
Simple Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Freely Moving Mice
Published on: February 24, 2023
6.1K
Laboratory Protocol and Pilot Results for Dynamic Interference Testing of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Sensors
Andreas Pfützner1,2,3, Hendrick Jensch1, Christopher Cardinal1
1Pfützner Science & Health Institute, Mainz, Germany.
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
|May 13, 2022
Summary
This study introduces a novel in vitro method for dynamic interference testing of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) sensors. The new setup accurately assesses sensor performance under changing conditions, aiding the development of more reliable glucose monitoring devices.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical Engineering
- Analytical Chemistry
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) sensors require stable fluidic environments for accurate performance.
- Previous in vitro interference testing used static concentrations, limiting real-world applicability.
- Dynamic testing is crucial to understand sensor behavior under fluctuating conditions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate a novel macrofluidic test stand for dynamic in vitro interference testing of CGM sensors.
- To assess the impact of dynamic interferent concentrations on Dexcom G6 and Freestyle Libre 2 sensor performance.
- To establish a reliable protocol for evaluating CGM sensor accuracy against potential interfering substances.
Main Methods:
- A macrofluidic test stand utilizing HPLC pumps to generate programmable glucose and interferent gradients in PBS was designed.
- Experimental parameters including channel dimensions, flow rates, and gradient slopes were optimized.
- Dexcom G6 and Freestyle Libre 2 sensors were tested against dynamic gradients of maltose, acetaminophen, and xylose, with YSI 2300 Stat plus as the reference.
Main Results:
- Both CGM sensors accurately tracked programmed glucose changes.
- Dexcom G6 (G6) readings closely matched reference glucose levels post-calibration.
- Freestyle Libre 2 (L2) showed lower readings, potentially due to factory calibration; both sensors were affected by specific interferents (acetaminophen for G6, xylose for L2) and temperature.
Conclusions:
- The developed experimental setup and protocol offer a valuable method for dynamic in vitro testing of CGM sensors against interfering substances.
- This approach can contribute to improving the accuracy and reliability of future generations of continuous glucose monitoring sensors.
- Understanding dynamic interference is key to enhancing the clinical utility of CGM technology.

