The Wider Considerations in Closing Chronic Disease Gaps - Focus on Heart Failure and Implementation
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 23, 2025

Author Spotlight: Workflow for Integrating POCUS Data into EHR for Managing Heart Failure Patients
Published on: July 12, 2024
Pupalan Iyngkaran1, Charlotte Hespe2, Fahad Hanna3
1Heart Failure & Cardiac Imaging, University of Notre Dame, Werribee Mercy Sub School, School of Medicine Sydney; Research Fellow Mitchell Institute, Victoria University, Victoria, Australia.
Insights
Addressing gaps in heart failure (HF) and chronic disease research is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes. This study highlights key areas like screening, self-management, and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) to improve clinical translation and cost-effectiveness.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Research
- Health Services Research
- Implementation Science
Background:
- Heart failure (HF) is a predominant chronic disease with significant overlaps in research and care with general chronic diseases.
- The overarching goal in chronic disease and HF research is optimizing patient outcomes while maximizing cost-effectiveness.
- Clinical translation of research findings is often hindered by patient-related variables and identified gaps in screening, self-management, and patient-reported outcomes (PRO).
Approach:
- A preliminary literature review identified a taxonomy for cardiovascular research.
- A review of published literature examined the translation of cardiovascular research studies into clinical practice.
- The study discusses differences in traditional research, focusing on screening, mixed methods, and chronic disease models of care.
Key Points:
- Six steps are proposed to facilitate research translation: research design, application (routine and challenges), transforming research to the translational level, funding and infrastructure, establishing Clinical Centres of Research Excellence (CCRE) and collaboration, and governance and cost-effectiveness.
- Implementation research, vital for linking findings to improved patient outcomes, is identified as a neglected area requiring complex skills.
- The document provides arguments for a framework for health services and models of care to guide future consensus.
Conclusions:
- Maximizing translational impacts for chronic disease research, particularly in a heart failure context, requires addressing implementation research challenges.
- Bridging the identified gaps in screening, self-management, and PRO is essential for effective clinical translation.
- Developing a robust framework for health services and models of care is a prerequisite for advancing chronic disease and HF research translation.
Background:
Heart failure (HF) is predominately a chronic disease. There are overlaps in HF and chronic disease research and care. Chronic disease and HF research are conducted with multiple goals. The overarching goal is "optimized patient outcomes at maximum costeffectiveness". However, observations on patients can come with many variables; thus, we see differences in clinical translation. This document discusses an argument for three important gaps common to HF and chronic disease, i.e., screening, self-management, and patient-reported outcomes (PRO), and provides a glance of how it could fit into the evidence tree. Pertinent arguments for a framework for health services and models of care are provided as a prelude to future consensus.
Methodology:
1) A preliminary literature review to identify a taxonomy for cardiovascular research, and 2) a review of the published literature describing the translation of research studies into clinical practice for cardiovascular disorders. A spectrum from observational to large randomized controlled trials to post-marketing studies were identified.
Discussion:
A brief discussion on traditional research and differences focusing on screening, mixed methods research concepts, and chronic diseases models of care. Six steps to facilitate this: 1) Research design; 2) Research application (translation) i. routine ii. challenges; 3. Transforming research to translational level; 4. Funding and infrastructure; 5. Clinical Centres of Research Excellence (CCRE) and collaboration; 6. Governance and cost-effectiveness.
Conclusion:
Implementation research that aims to link research findings to improved patient outcomes in an efficient and effective way is a neglected area. Skills required to perform implementation research are complex. Ways to maximize translational impacts for chronic disease research to clinical practice are described in a HF context.
More Related Videos
09:20Lumped-Parameter and Finite Element Modeling of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
Published on: February 13, 2021
05:16Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure VII: Nursing Interventions
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy VI: Nursing Management
Heart Failure III: Clinical Manifestations