Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 23, 2025

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
Published on: May 10, 2019
Cesario's framework for understanding group disparities is radically incomplete
Morgan Weaving1, Cordelia Fine1
1School of Historical and Philosophical Studies, The University of Melbourne, Victoria3010, Australia. mweaving@student.unimelb.edu.au; cfine@unimelb.edu.auhttps://findanexpert.unimelb.edu.au/profile/126041-cordelia-fine.
Abstract:
Cesario argues that experimental studies of bias tell us little about why group disparities exist. We argue that Cesario's alternative approach implicitly frames understanding of group disparities as a false binary between "bias" and "group differences." This, we suggest, will contribute little to our understanding of the complex dynamics that produce group disparities, and risks inappropriately rationalizing them.
Related Concept Videos
Impact of Groups on Individuals
Impact of Groups on Groups
Impact of Individuals on a Group
In- and Out-Groups
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Stereotype Content Model

