Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Impact of Groups on Individuals01:28

Impact of Groups on Individuals

26
Groups play a fundamental role in shaping individual behavior, as they establish norms that guide interactions and decision-making. Social psychology examines how individuals conform to group expectations, often adjusting their attitudes and actions to align with group norms. These norms can be formal, such as workplace policies, or informal, such as unspoken social expectations within a fraternity.Conformity and Social InfluenceConformity arises when individuals modify their behaviors or...
26
Impact of Groups on Groups01:19

Impact of Groups on Groups

13
Social psychologists analyze how groups influence one another, shaping social structures and interactions through both cooperation and competition. These dynamics manifest in various ways, ranging from economic partnerships to intergroup conflicts that shape societal structures and perceptions.Cooperation and Competition in Intergroup RelationsIntergroup relationships vary across contexts, sometimes fostering cooperation and mutual benefit while at other times leading to conflict and...
13
Impact of Individuals on a Group01:25

Impact of Individuals on a Group

8
In social psychology, the interplay between individuals and groups is a central concern, particularly regarding how individual actions and characteristics influence group processes and outcomes. While much research emphasizes the group's power in shaping individual behavior, it is equally significant to understand how individuals contribute to the functioning, development, and success of groups.Individual Roles in Group Productivity and Decision-MakingIndividuals are not passive participants in...
8
In- and Out-Groups01:31

In- and Out-Groups

40.3K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
40.3K
Self-Discrepancy Theory02:45

Self-Discrepancy Theory

18.5K
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.  
18.5K
Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

14.9K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Himpathy and status: Attitudes to social hierarchy predict reactions to sexual harassment.

PloS one·2023
Same author

Beyond Mars and Venus: The role of gender essentialism in support for gender inequality and backlash.

PloS one·2018
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 23, 2025

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.5K

Cesario's framework for understanding group disparities is radically incomplete.

Morgan Weaving1, Cordelia Fine1

  • 1School of Historical and Philosophical Studies, The University of Melbourne, Victoria3010, Australia. mweaving@student.unimelb.edu.au; cfine@unimelb.edu.auhttps://findanexpert.unimelb.edu.au/profile/126041-cordelia-fine.

The Behavioral and Brain Sciences
|May 13, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Understanding group disparities requires moving beyond a simple bias versus group differences framework. This binary approach oversimplifies complex social dynamics and risks rationalizing inequality.

More Related Videos

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias
09:03

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias

Published on: February 29, 2020

5.9K
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

12.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 23, 2025

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.5K
Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias
09:03

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias

Published on: February 29, 2020

5.9K
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

12.0K

Area of Science:

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology
  • Behavioral Economics

Background:

  • Experimental studies on bias offer limited insight into the root causes of group disparities.
  • Existing frameworks may oversimplify the multifaceted nature of inequality.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critique Cesario's argument that experimental bias studies are insufficient for understanding group disparities.
  • To propose an alternative perspective on analyzing the complex dynamics underlying group disparities.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis and critique of existing theoretical frameworks.
  • Examination of the limitations of framing group disparities as a binary of "bias" versus "group differences."

Main Results:

  • Cesario's approach, while critiquing experimental bias studies, frames the issue as a false dichotomy.
  • This binary framing fails to capture the complex interplay of factors contributing to group disparities.

Conclusions:

  • The "bias" versus "group differences" dichotomy is an inadequate model for understanding the origins of group disparities.
  • This oversimplified framework risks rationalizing existing inequalities rather than addressing their complex causes.