Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 23, 2025

Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia
Published on: February 17, 2023
Herbal medicine for COVID-19: An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analysis
Lin Ang1, Eunhye Song2, Junhua Zhang3
1KM Science Research Division, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea; Korean Convergence Medicine, University of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Insights
This study reviewed 21 systematic reviews on herbal medicine for COVID-19. While evidence suggests benefits, the low methodological quality means current findings on herbal treatments for coronavirus disease 2019 are inconclusive.
Area of Science:
- Integrative Medicine
- Evidence-Based Medicine
- Public Health
Background:
- The rapid spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has led to extensive research on treatments, including herbal medicine.
- A critical appraisal of the growing body of scientific literature is necessary to navigate findings effectively.
- This study provides an overview of systematic reviews (SRs) to synthesize evidence on herbal medicine for COVID-19 treatment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To synthesize evidence from systematic reviews (SRs) regarding the efficacy of herbal medicine interventions for treating COVID-19.
- To critically appraise the quality of existing evidence on herbal medicine in COVID-19 treatment.
Main Methods:
- A comprehensive search of four databases was conducted up to October 20, 2021.
- Systematic reviews (SRs) analyzing primary studies on the efficacy of herbal medications for COVID-19 were included.
- Methodological quality of the included SRs was assessed using the AMSTAR 2 tool.
Main Results:
- Twenty-one SRs published between May 2020 and September 2021 were included.
- Twelve SRs found insufficient evidence for definitive conclusions, while nine suggested potential benefits of herbal therapy.
- The overall methodological quality of the included SRs was assessed as low.
Conclusions:
- While considerable evidence suggests potential advantages of herbal medicine interventions for COVID-19, the quality of this evidence is inadequate.
- Current evidence does not allow for solid and accurate judgments on the effectiveness of herbal medicine therapies for coronavirus disease 2019.
- Adherence to established methodological standards in clinical studies and SRs is crucial, even during a pandemic crisis.
Background:
As coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) continues to spread throughout countries, researchers and scientific groups have published a large number of scientific papers examining effective treatments and prevention strategies for COVID-19, including herbal medicine. It has become difficult to navigate the increasing volume of scientific material on the pandemic, and critical appraisal of these outcomes is needed. This overview of systematic reviews (SRs) aims to synthesize evidence from SRs and summarize the effects of herbal medicine interventions in the treatment of COVID-19.
Methods:
Four databases were searched from inception up to October 20, 2021. SRs analyzing primary studies of the efficacy of herbal medications for treating COVID-19 were included. Two reviewers selected the studies and retrieved the data independently. The AMSTAR 2 (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews) was used to assess the methodological quality of the included SRs.
Results:
A total of 21 SRs on herbal medicine treatments for COVID-19 were included. All SRs were published between May 2020 and September 2021. Thirteen of the SRs included only randomized controlled trials (RCTs), whereas the remaining eight included evidence from nonrandomized trials in addition to RCTs, with a significant overlap identified across the RCTs. Twelve SRs concluded that existing evidence was insufficient to form a definite judgment, nine found that herbal therapy was useful, and none indicated that herbal medicine had no benefit. The AMSTAR 2 tool revealed that the methodological quality of the included SRs was generally low.
Conclusion:
In this overview of SRs, we reviewed herbal medicine-related evidence from 21 SRs that were published after the outbreak of COVID-19. This study shows that while there is considerable evidence demonstrating the advantages of herbal medicine interventions, the quality of the evidence is inadequate to provide solid and accurate judgments about the effectiveness of herbal medicine therapies for COVID-19. Despite the crisis caused by the pandemic, clinical studies and SRs should comply with established methodological standards.
More Related Videos
08:36Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
Published on: April 19, 2024
07:58Behavioral and Network Pharmacology-Based Analyses for the Traditional Mongolian Medicine Zadi-5 in a Rat Model of Depression
Published on: February 24, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Drugs Used in Upper Respiratory Disorders: Overview
Antihistamines (e.g., Benadryl) block histamines from binding. Histamines are chemicals released during an allergic reaction in the body. As a...
Drug Classes and Categories