Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 23, 2025

Novel and Innovative Hybrid Technique for Type A Aortic Dissection
Published on: March 28, 2025
Evaluation of a standardized protocol for medical management of uncomplicated acute type B aortic dissection
Antony Aziz1, Hannah O'Donnell2, Donald G Harris1
1Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
Insights
A standardized protocol for type B aortic dissection (TBAD) reduced hospital costs and length of stay. This evidence-based approach improved resource utilization without impacting patient mortality rates.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Thoracic Surgery
- Medical Economics
Background:
- Uncomplicated acute type B aortic dissection (TBAD) management relies on antihypertensive agents, with significant provider-dependent variability.
- Standardized, evidence-based protocols are lacking for TBAD medical management, potentially leading to increased resource utilization and costs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of a standardized, goal-directed medical management protocol for uncomplicated acute TBAD.
- To determine if protocol implementation reduces resource utilization and healthcare costs without compromising patient outcomes.
Main Methods:
- A multidisciplinary team developed a protocol emphasizing early oral medication, antihypertensive infusion weaning, and de-escalation of care.
- A retrospective review compared patients before (n=21) and after (n=18) protocol implementation (April 2016-2020), excluding those requiring intervention.
- Outcomes assessed included length of stay, costs, and 30-day mortality.
Main Results:
- Post-protocol patients showed significantly shorter total (5.5 vs 8.6 days) and ICU (1.8 vs 3.2 days) lengths of stay.
- The protocol was associated with decreased total hospital costs ($28,066 vs $38,928) and pharmacy costs ($1181 vs $5094).
- Fewer oral antihypertensive agents were required at discharge (2.7 vs 3.8), with no significant difference in 30-day mortality.
Conclusions:
- A goal-directed protocol effectively reduces resource utilization and costs for uncomplicated acute TBAD.
- This standardized approach improves efficiency without adversely affecting early mortality.
- The protocol's success suggests potential broader applicability in managing acute aortic syndromes.
Objectives:
The goals of medical management for uncomplicated acute type B aortic dissection (TBAD) are to prevent expansion of the false lumen and malperfusion syndrome. This is accomplished with antihypertensive agents, but medication selection and titration are typically provider-dependent. Given the paucity of data on evidence-based management of this population, we hypothesized that a standardized TBAD medical management protocol would reduce resource utilization and costs, without compromising patient outcomes.
Methods:
A multidisciplinary team developed a goal-directed protocol to standardize the medical management of uncomplicated acute TBAD, with an emphasis on early initiation of oral medications, weaning of anti-hypertensive infusions, and frequent assessment for de-escalation of care. Implementation was in April 2018. A retrospective review of patients with acute TBAD presenting to our institution from April 2016 to April 2020 was performed. Patients requiring aortic or peripheral intervention were excluded. Included patients were analyzed based on treatment before or after protocol implementation. Patient demographics, systolic blood pressure, presence of acute kidney injury at presentation, length of stay, cost metrics, and 30-day mortality were compared.
Results:
Thirty-nine patients were included, 21 pre- and 18 post-protocol implementation. Baseline demographics, systolic blood pressure, and presence of acute kidney injury at presentation were similar between the groups. Post-protocol patients had shorter total (8.6 vs 5.5 days; P = .02) and intensive care unit (3.2 vs 1.8 days; P = .002) length of stay. The protocol was associated with significantly decreased total hospital ($38,928 vs $28,066; P = .04), total variable ($23,115 vs $15,627; P = .02), and pharmacy ($5094 vs $1181; P < .001) costs, whereas inpatient care costs ($15,152 vs $11,467; P = .09) trended down. Post-protocol patients required fewer oral antihypertensive agents at discharge (3.8 vs 2.7; P = .005). No significant difference in 30-day mortality was observed.
Conclusions:
A goal-directed protocol reduces resource utilization and costs without compromising early mortality rates for patients with uncomplicated acute TBAD. Such a strategy may have broader application in medical management of acute aortic syndromes.
More Related Videos
08:50Technique and Patient Selection Criteria of Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy for Minimal Access Aortic Valve Replacement
Published on: March 26, 2018
06:51Author Spotlight: Development of a Minimally Invasive Large-Animal Model for Reliable and Reproducible Cardiovascular Research
Published on: October 20, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management