Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 23, 2025

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
CCDC68 predicts poor prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer: a study based on TCGA data
Wei Zhang1,2, Ting-Ting Xu1,2, Zhen-Tao An1,2
1Department of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hospital of Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Background:
The prognostic value of coiled-coil domain containing 68 (CCDC68) in colorectal cancer (CRC) is unclear. We evaluated the role of CCDC68 in CRC based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database.
Methods:
Patients with CRC were collected from TCGA. We determined CCDC68 expression using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Logistic analysis was applied to study the relationship between CCDC68 expression and clinicopathologic features. Cox regression and the Kaplan-Meier method were used to determine the predictive value of CCDC68 on clinical outcomes in CRC patients. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) and the single-sample Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (ssGSEA) were also conducted to annotate the biological function of CCDC68.
Results:
Reduced CCDC68 expression in CRC was significantly correlated with N stage [odds ratio (OR) =0.95 for N1/N2 vs. N0], M stage (OR =0.91 for M1 vs. M0), pathologic stage (OR =0.95 for stage III/stage IV vs. stage I/stage II), neoplasm type (OR =0.92 for rectum adenocarcinoma vs. colon adenocarcinoma), tumor protein 53 (TP53) status [OR =0.93 for Mut (mutant) vs. WT (wild type)], and kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene (KRAS) status (OR =0.97 for Mut vs. WT) (all P values <0.05). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that low CCDC68 expression had a poorer overall survival (OS) (P=0.008), progression-free interval (PFI) (P=0.006), and disease-specific survival (DSS) (P=0.023). Cox regression analysis revealed that CCDC68 was a risk factor for OS (P=0.047), PFI (P=0.048), and DSS (P=0.038). GSEA demonstrated that the chemokine signaling pathway, the Janus kinase-signal transducers and activators of transcription (JAK-STAT) signaling pathway, high-affinity IgE receptor (FcεRI)-mediated nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) activation, cell adhesion molecules (CAMs), complement cascade, FcεRI-mediated mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) activation, intestinal immune network for immunoglobulin A (IgA) production, and Toll-like receptor signaling pathway were differentially enriched in the high CCDC68 expression phenotype, while the Wnt signaling pathway was significantly enriched in the low CCDC68 expression phenotype. SsGSEA found that CCDC68 expression was positively correlated with T helper 2 (Th2) and T helper cells.
Conclusions:
CCDC68 expression may be a potential prognostic molecular marker for poor survival in CRC. Moreover, CCDC68 may participate in the development of CRC via multiple signaling pathways.
More Related Videos
07:13Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
Published on: April 18, 2025
06:24Author Spotlight: Liujunzi Decoction as a Traditional Chinese Treatment for Coloproctitis Cancer
Published on: October 13, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Tumor Progression
Colon cancer is one of the best-documented examples of tumor progression. Early mutation in the APC gene in colon cells causes a small growth on the colon wall called a polyp. With time, this polyp grows into a benign, pre-cancerous tumor. Further...
Cancer-Critical Genes II: Tumor Suppressor Genes
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...
Cancer Survival Analysis