Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 23, 2025
Scanning Electron Microscopic Evaluation of Surface Defects of Remover Retreatment File After Single and Multiple Uses
Published on: October 11, 2024
Evaluation of debris and smear layer formation using three different NI-TI rotary instrument systems: An in vitro
Saikat Chatterjee1, Priti D Desai1, Sayantan Mukherjee1
1Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Guru Nanak Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Aim:
The aim of the study is to evaluate of debris and smear layer formation after using rotary ProTaper Universal, Twisted File, and XP Endo file systems under scanning electron microscope.
Materials And Methods:
Forty freshly extracted mandibular second premolar teeth were taken to decoronate at the cementoenamel junction to make the remaining root length 15 mm. Specimens were divided into four groups of 10 teeth each, Group I (control) - no instrumentation. Group II - ProTaper Universal rotary file (F2), Group III - twisted file (ISO size 0.25 and 6% taper), Group IV - XP Endo file (ISO size 0.25). During instrumentation, 5 ml normal saline was used as irrigating agent. Grooves parallel to the longitudinal axis of the root were made on the mesial and distal surface of each specimen to split it into two halves and examined under scanning electron microscope at ×1500 and ×5000 magnification. Photomicrographs were taken to evaluate debris and smear layer. Evaluation of photomicrographs was done using a score index.
Results:
One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare more than one means at a time. Tukey's critical difference followed by ANOVA was used to compare the mean values pair wise. P <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Among all the file systems, Group II showed maximum amount of debris (3.50 ± 1.109) followed by Group III (2.83 ± 1.238) and least amount was showed by Group IV (2.65 ± 1.122) at all levels (cervical, middle, and apical third). Among all the experimental groups, Group II showed maximum amount of smear layer (2.75 ± 1.149) followed by Group III (2.40 ± 0.982) and least amount of smear layer shown by Group IV (2.10 ± 0.841) at all levels (cervical, middle and apical third), the result was statistically significant (P < 0.05).
Conclusions:
At all the levels (cervical third, middle third, and apical third), among all the experimental groups, highest amount of debris and smear layer was formed by ProTaper Universal rotary file followed by Twisted file and least amount showed by XP Endo file system. In all the levels, control group showed highest amount of debris but least amount of smear layer.
