Marginal versus Standard Donors in Heart Transplantation: Proper Selection Means Heart Transplant Benefit

Olimpia Bifulco1, Tomaso Bottio1, Raphael Caraffa1

  • 1Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy.

Insights

Using marginal donors (MDs) for heart transplantation (HTx) expands the donor pool. While overall survival is lower than with standard donors (SDs), selected MDs offer promising mid-term outcomes, especially when considering risk-adjusted mortality.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Transplantation Medicine
  • Organ Donor Research

Background:

  • Assessing mid-term outcomes of heart transplantation (HTx) using marginal donors (MDs).
  • Comparing outcomes between MD and standard donor (SD) recipients.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Evaluate the efficacy and safety of utilizing marginal donor hearts.
  • Identify risk factors for graft failure and mortality in MD recipients.
  • Compare survival rates between MD and SD recipients.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 238 HTx patients (January 2012 - December 2020).
  • Primary endpoints: early and long-term survival of MD recipients.
  • Secondary endpoint: comparison of MD versus SD recipient survival.
  • Multivariate analysis for risk factors of primary graft failure (PGF) and mortality.

Main Results:

  • 64 (26.9%) patients received organs from MDs.
  • MD recipients showed 1-year survival of 70% and 5-year survival of 68.1%.
  • Risk factors for mortality in MD recipients included decreased renal function and increased inotropic support.
  • Increased cold ischemic time and donor inotropic support were independent risk factors for PGF.
  • Overall 5-year survival was higher in SD recipients (85%) than MD recipients (68.1%).
  • Risk-adjusted mortality and 5-year conditional survival were comparable between groups.

Conclusions:

  • Selected marginal donors are a valuable resource for expanding the cardiac donor pool.
  • Utilizing marginal donors demonstrates promising mid-term results.
  • Prolonged ischemic times, increased inotropic support (donor or recipient), and decreased renal function are associated with worse outcomes in MD recipients.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Kidney Transplant I: Introduction01:28

Kidney Transplant I: Introduction

A kidney transplant is a surgical approach that involves replacing a non-functioning kidney with a healthy one from a donor. This procedure is often a treatment option for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. The method requires careful recipient selection, including evaluating various medical and psychosocial factors. These criteria vary between transplant centers but generally include assessments of the patient's overall health, adherence to medical recommendations, and lifestyle...
66
Bone Marrow Sampling and Transplants01:22

Bone Marrow Sampling and Transplants

Bone marrow transplant is a potential cure for several diseases, including cancer and specific genetic disorders. Notably, this procedure is applicable for patients suffering from aplastic anemia, certain types of leukemia, severe combined immunodeficiency disease (SCID), Hodgkin's disease, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, multiple myeloma, thalassemia, sickle-cell disease, and certain cancers.
The transplant begins with high doses of chemotherapy and radiation treatment, which aim to destroy...
518
Tissue Transplantation01:24

Tissue Transplantation

Tissue transplantation is a significant medical procedure involving the transfer of cells, tissues, or organs from a donor to a recipient, with the primary aim of restoring lost functions. This procedure is crucial in treating a broad spectrum of diseases, including kidney diseases, liver failure, heart disease, and certain types of cancers.
The Biology of Tissue Transplantation
The biology of tissue transplantation hinges on the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) molecules. These molecules...
536