Deep networks may capture biological behavior for shallow, but not deep, empirical characterizations

We assess whether deep convolutional networks (DCN) can account for a most fundamental property of human vision: detection/discrimination of elementary image elements (bars) at different contrast levels. The human visual process can be characterized to varying degrees of "depth," ranging from percentage of correct detection to detailed tuning and operating characteristics of the underlying perceptual mechanism. We challenge deep networks with the same stimuli/tasks used with human observers and apply equivalent characterization of the stimulus-response coupling. In general, we find that popular DCN architectures do not account for signature properties of the human process. For shallow depth of characterization, some variants of network-architecture/training-protocol produce human-like trends; however, more articulate empirical descriptors expose glaring discrepancies. Networks can be coaxed into learning those richer descriptors by shadowing a human surrogate in the form of a tailored circuit perturbed by unstructured input, thus ruling out the possibility that human-model misalignment in standard protocols may be attributable to insufficient representational power. These results urge caution in assessing whether neural networks do or do not capture human behavior: ultimately, our ability to assess "success" in this area can only be as good as afforded by the depth of behavioral characterization against which the network is evaluated. We propose a novel set of metrics/protocols that impose stringent constraints on the evaluation of DCN behavior as an adequate approximation to biological processes.