Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 23, 2025

Design and Implementation of an fMRI Study Examining Thought Suppression in Young Women with, and At-risk, for Depression
Published on: May 19, 2015
Exploring relationships between perceived suppression capabilities and resident performance of wildfire mitigations
Amanda M Stasiewicz1, Travis B Paveglio2
1Department of Environmental Studies & Wildfire Interdisciplinary Research Center, San José State University, One Washington Square, San José, CA, USA.
Residents trust local fire departments (LFDs) but know they have limited capacity for wildfire response. This trust is linked to fewer home mitigation actions, suggesting a need for clearer communication on resident responsibilities for wildfire preparedness.
Area of Science:
- Wildfire Management
- Community Resilience
- Human Dimensions of Natural Hazards
Background:
- Increasing wildfire activity necessitates enhanced local capacity for wildfire risk reduction in residential areas.
- Local fire departments (LFDs) face growing demands in wildland-urban interfaces due to increased incidents and socio-demographic shifts.
- Understanding resident perceptions of fire service organizations (FSOs) is crucial for effective wildfire risk mitigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore rural residents' perceptions of various fire service organizations (FSOs) in wildfire-prone areas.
- To examine the relationship between perceptions of LFD capabilities and resident wildfire risk mitigation activities.
- To identify how trust and perceived capacity of FSOs influence home defense strategies.
Main Methods:
- A mixed-mode survey administered to 770 residents in wildfire-prone areas of northeastern Washington State.
- Exploration of perceptions regarding LFDs and other FSOs (state, federal, private).
- Analysis of correlations between perceptions of LFD capacity/capabilities and performance of 11 home wildfire mitigation activities.
Main Results:
- Residents expressed high trust in LFDs for wildfire response, exceeding trust in other FSOs.
- A significant negative correlation was found between trust in LFDs and resident implementation of fire-resistant siding and sprinklers.
- Perceptions of LFD capacity were negatively correlated with purchasing generators and proper firewood storage.
Conclusions:
- Perceptions of FSOs are associated with specific wildfire mitigation actions, like firewood placement and siding choices.
- Trust in LFDs did not significantly correlate with many other recommended mitigation actions, indicating potential gaps in understanding or motivation.
- Findings suggest a need to better align resident expectations with LFD capacities and to promote shared responsibility in wildfire risk reduction.
Related Concept Videos
Obedience
Fundamental Attribution Error
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model
Self-Regulation
Social Facilitation

