Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 23, 2025
Brain Infarct Segmentation and Registration on MRI or CT for Lesion-symptom Mapping
Published on: September 25, 2019
Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Hyperintensities in Acute and Subacute-Phase Intracerebral Hemorrhage
Yuji Shiga1, Shiro Aoki2, Saki Tasaka1
1Department of Neurology, Suiseikai Kajikawa Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Objective:
Diffusion-weighted imaging hyperintensities are observed in intracerebral hemorrhage patients at times and might be associated with unfavorable functional outcomes. However, the suitable time to evaluate diffusion-weighted imaging hyperintensities to influence stroke outcome remains unclear. This study investigated the associations between acute and sub-acute diffusion-weighted imaging hyperintensities and functional outcomes among patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage.
Methods:
Diffusion-weighted imaging hyperintensities were evaluated within 24 h (acute phase) and at 14 ± 5 days (sub-acute phase). An unfavorable functional outcome was a score of 5-6 on the modified Rankin Scale at 3 months.
Results:
Among 268 intracerebral hemorrhage patients, diffusion-weighted imaging hyperintensities in the acute phase were observed in 32 (11.9%). Among 227 patients who underwent a second magnetic resonance imaging in the sub-acute phase, diffusion-weighted imaging hyperintensities were observed in 57 (25.1%). Multivariable analysis revealed that the baseline intracerebral hemorrhage volume, history of stroke, and severe white matter lesions were associated with sub-acute diffusion-weighted imaging hyperintensities. The patients with unfavorable outcomes (n = 37) had a higher frequency of sub-acute diffusion-weighted imaging hyperintensities than those without (n = 190) (51.4% vs. 20.0%, P < 0.001); the frequencies of acute diffusion-weighted imaging hyperintensities were not significantly different between the groups (13.5% vs. 10.0%, P = 0.559). Sub-acute diffusion-weighted imaging hyperintensities were independently associated with unfavorable outcomes after adjusting for confounding factors (Odds Ratio, 3.35, 95% CI 1.20-9.35, P = 0.021).
Conclusion:
The rate of sub-acute diffusion-weighted imaging hyperintensities was higher than acute diffusion-weighted imaging hyperintensities among acute intracerebral hemorrhage patients and likely to be associated with unfavorable outcomes.
