Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 23, 2025

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias
Published on: February 29, 2020
Judges' experiences with mitigating jurors' implicit biases
Jacqueline M Kirshenbaum1, Monica K Miller1
1Interdisciplinary Social Psychology, University of Nevada Reno, Reno, NV, USA.
Abstract:
Implicit bias can influence jury decision-making. Training judges about implicit bias is a fairly new endeavor, and not all judges are necessarily aware of these biases. Even when judges are aware that biases exist, they might not know whether or not they should alert jurors to such biases or how to appropriately do so. It is currently unknown how many judges alert jurors to implicit bias (e.g. via instructions or juror orientation). The purpose of this study is to discuss judges' beliefs and practices regarding implicit bias in the courtroom. The findings indicate that the majority of judges (72%) do not alert jurors to implicit bias. Many judges were found to have a lack of awareness or understanding about implicit bias, but many now feel that alerting jurors about bias is important and would like to do so in the future.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Confirmation Biases
Hindsight Biases
Halo Effect
Motivational Bias
Stereotype Content Model

