Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 23, 2025

28:13
Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
33.5K
Automated MSCT Analysis for Planning Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Using Artificial Intelligence.
Kilian Michiels1, Eva Heffinck1, Patricio Astudillo1
1FEops NV, Gent, Belgium.
Journal of Interventional Cardiology
|May 16, 2022
Summary
This study introduces an AI-driven workflow for automated multislice computed tomography analysis in structural heart interventions like left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). The AI system demonstrates high accuracy and speed, potentially improving efficiency and standardization in cardiac procedures.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Imaging
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
- Medical Device Technology
Background:
- Increasing volume of multislice computed tomography (MSCT) analyses for structural heart interventions necessitates automation.
- Current manual analysis methods are time-consuming, lack standardization, and have a steep learning curve.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the feasibility of a fully automated artificial intelligence (AI)-based MSCT analysis system.
- To specifically apply and evaluate this system for planning left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) procedures.
Main Methods:
- Deep learning models were trained and validated on 583 patient MSCT datasets with manual annotations.
- Models were developed to detect key anatomical structures (ostium, landing zones, mitral valve annulus, fossa ovalis) and segment the left atrium and appendage.
- Accuracy was evaluated against manual measurements and segmentations.
Main Results:
- Automated segmentation of the left atrium/appendage showed high similarity to manual segmentation (Dice score 0.94 ± 0.02).
- Measurements of anatomical ostium and landing zones demonstrated minimal differences compared to manual measurements, comparable to operator variability.
- Detection of the mitral valve annulus and fossa ovalis was accurate, with low Hausdorff distances.
- The complete automated workflow, including pre- and post-processing, averaged 57.5 ± 34.5 seconds per patient.
Conclusions:
- A fast and accurate AI-based workflow for automated MSCT analysis in LAAO planning has been developed.
- This automated approach can significantly aid in managing the increasing patient caseload for structural heart interventions.
- The AI system's capabilities are potentially extensible to other structural heart interventions.

