Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 23, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
The Causal Fairness Field Guide: Perspectives From Social and Formal Sciences
1Department of Computer Science and Computer Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States.
This field guide bridges causal fairness in machine learning with philosophy, sociology, and law. It aims to align technical fairness metrics with humanistic values for marginalized groups.
Area of Science:
- Interdisciplinary research at the intersection of computer science (machine learning), philosophy, sociology, and law.
- Focus on ethical AI and algorithmic fairness.
Background:
- Numerous methods for measuring causal fairness in machine learning have emerged.
- A significant gap exists in literature connecting causality-based fairness notions with social sciences.
- This disconnect hinders a comprehensive understanding of fairness in AI systems.
Purpose of the Study:
- To synthesize and explain causality-based fairness notions from both social and formal sciences.
- To bridge the gap between technical machine learning fairness metrics and social science perspectives.
- To guide practitioners in aligning fairness metrics with humanistic values and serving marginalized populations.
Main Methods:
- Compilation and exposition of causality-based fair machine learning notions.
- Explanation of mathematical backgrounds for popular causality-based fairness metrics.
- Analysis of the interplay between these notions and the fields of philosophy and law.
- Exploration of sociological and technical criticisms of current fairness approaches.
Main Results:
- Provides a foundational understanding of causality-based fairness in machine learning.
- Highlights the connections and tensions between technical fairness definitions and philosophical/legal concepts.
- Identifies key sociological and technical critiques of existing fairness methodologies.
Conclusions:
- Facilitates a deeper understanding of how causality-based fairness aligns with humanistic values.
- Offers insights for developing improved fairness metrics and methods in machine learning.
- Emphasizes the need for interdisciplinary approaches to ensure AI serves marginalized communities equitably.
Related Concept Videos
Causes of Social Behavior II: Cognitive Processes
Causality in Epidemiology
Scientific Nature of Social Psychology
Attribution Theory
Equity Theory
Social Cognitive Perspective on Personality

