Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 23, 2025

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
Prediction models as gatekeepers for diagnostic testing in angina patients with suspected chronic coronary syndrome
Louise Hougesen Bjerking1, Simon Winther2, Kim Wadt Hansen1
1Department of Cardiology, Bispebjerg Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 2400 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Insights
A validated clinical prediction model for coronary artery disease (CAD) effectively identifies patients needing further testing. This model improves upon current guidelines by better stratifying risk and reducing unnecessary diagnostic procedures for coronary artery disease.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Diagnostics
- Predictive Analytics
Background:
- Pre-test probability (PTP) assessment is crucial for selecting patients for coronary artery disease (CAD) diagnostic testing.
- The 2019 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines suggest risk factor-based PTP upgrades but lack specific estimations.
- Contemporary cohorts have lower CAD prevalence, necessitating updated validation of PTP models.
Purpose of the Study:
- To validate two published PTP models in a current low-CAD-prevalence population.
- To compare the performance of these models against the ESC 2019 PTP.
- To evaluate the clinical utility of different PTP models in a real-world setting.
Main Methods:
- Validation of basic, clinical, and ESC 2019 PTP models in 42,328 patients undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography.
- Analysis of model discrimination using the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC).
- Assessment of model calibration and clinical impact at a ≤5% CAD probability cut-off.
Main Results:
- All models demonstrated good discrimination (AUCs ranging from 0.74-0.76).
- The ESC 2019 PTP overestimated CAD prevalence, while basic and clinical models were well-calibrated at ≤5% probability.
- The clinical model ruled out 36.2% more patients than the ESC 2019 PTP at the ≤5% cut-off, with a manageable increase in missed obstructive CAD cases (3.6% vs 22.2%).
Conclusions:
- A validated prediction model incorporating cardiovascular risk factors for CAD is presented.
- Implementing this model could significantly reduce the need for diagnostic testing.
- The model can serve as an effective gatekeeper, enabling a watchful waiting strategy for a substantial proportion of patients.
Aims:
Assessment of pre-test probability (PTP) is an important gatekeeper when selecting patients for diagnostic testing for coronary artery disease (CAD). The 2019 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines recommend upgrading PTP based on clinical risk factors but provide no estimates of how these affect PTP. We aimed to validate two published PTP models in a contemporary low-CAD-prevalence cohort and compare with the ESC 2019 PTP.
Methods And Results:
Previously published basic and clinical prediction models and the ESC 2019 PTP were validated in 42 328 patients (54% women) ≥30 years old without previous CAD referred for cardiac computed tomography angiography in a region of Denmark from 2008 to 2017. Obstructive CAD prevalence was 8.8%. The ESC 2019 PTP and basic model included angina symptoms, sex, and age, while the clinical model added diabetes mellitus family history of CAD, and dyslipidaemia. Discrimination was good for all three models [area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) 0.76, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.75-0.77), 0.74 (0.73-0.75), and 0.76 (0.75-0.76), respectively]. Using the clinically relevant low predicted probability ≤5% of CAD cut-off, the clinical and basic models were well calibrated, whereas the ESC 2019 PTP overestimated CAD prevalence. At a cut-off of ≤5%, the clinical model ruled out 36.2% more patients than the ESC 2019 PTP, n = 23 592 (55.7%) vs. n = 8 245 (19.5%), while missing 824 (22.2%) vs. 132 (3.6%) cases of obstructive CAD.
Conclusion:
A prediction model for CAD including cardiovascular risk factors was successfully validated. Implementation of this model would reduce the need for diagnostic testing and serve as gatekeeper if accepting a watchful waiting strategy for one-fifth of the patients.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Angina III: Clinical Manifestations and Assessment
Angina V: Nursing Management
Angina II: Classification
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care

