Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Scientific Laws and Theories

Scientific Laws and Theories

Scientific Laws

Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?

Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?

The outcome of any hypothesis testing leads to rejecting or not rejecting the null hypothesis. This decision is taken based on the analysis of the data, an appropriate test statistic, an appropriate confidence level, the critical values, and P-values. However, when the evidence suggests that the null hypothesis cannot be rejected, is it right to say, 'Accept' the null hypothesis?
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null...

Psychology as a Science

Psychology as a Science

Psychology, as a scientific discipline, aims to understand the mind and behavior through rigorous and systematic methods. The foundation of psychological research is evidence-based, relying heavily on the scientific method to derive and validate knowledge. This structured approach ensures that findings are reliable, valid, and applicable to broader contexts.
The scientific method in psychology involves six critical steps: making observations, formulating hypotheses, conducting tests, analyzing...

The Scientific Method

The Scientific Method

Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.

The Evidence for Evolution

The Evidence for Evolution

Genetic variations accumulating within populations over generations give rise to biological evolution. Evolutionary changes can result in the formation of novel varieties and entire new species. These changes are responsible for the diverse forms of life inhabiting the planet. The evidence for evolution suggests that all living organisms descended from common ancestors.

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Optimizing Contraceptive Effectiveness-Lessons From HER Salt Lake on Prioritizing Patient-Centered Care.

JAMA network open·2026

Same author

Pregnancy care-seeking stress in the USA: a prospective cohort study.

BMJ open·2026

Same author

Cohort profile: The Nepal Turnaway Study.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026

Same author

Impact of COVID-19 among women seeking abortion services in Nepal: results from a longitudinal study.

Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique·2025

Same author

Changes in Abortion Access, Travel, and Costs Since the Implementation of State Abortion Bans, 2022-2024.

American journal of public health·2025

Same author

Postabortion contraceptive use among women in Nepal: results from a longitudinal cohort study.

Reproductive health·2024

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 23, 2025

Straightforward Assay for Quantification of Social Avoidance in Drosophila melanogaster

Straightforward Assay for Quantification of Social Avoidance in Drosophila melanogaster

Published on: December 13, 2014

The Court is ignoring science.

Diana Greene Foster¹

¹Diana Greene Foster is a professor in the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences and director of research at Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, University of California San Francisco, CA, USA.

Science (New York, N.Y.)

|May 16, 2022

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

The US Supreme Court may overturn Roe v. Wade, disregarding decades of legal precedent. This decision ignores substantial evidence of abortion

More Related Videos

Silencing the Spark: CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing in Weakly Electric Fish

Silencing the Spark: CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing in Weakly Electric Fish

Published on: October 27, 2019

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 23, 2025

Straightforward Assay for Quantification of Social Avoidance in Drosophila melanogaster

Straightforward Assay for Quantification of Social Avoidance in Drosophila melanogaster

Published on: December 13, 2014

Silencing the Spark: CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing in Weakly Electric Fish

Silencing the Spark: CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing in Weakly Electric Fish

Published on: October 27, 2019

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

Area of Science:

Public Health
Legal Studies
Societal Impact

Background:

A leaked US Supreme Court draft opinion suggests the potential overturning of Roe v. Wade.
This potential reversal concerns the landmark 1973 decision that established abortion rights nationwide.

Discussion:

Overturning Roe v. Wade disregards established legal precedent spanning decades.
The decision also overlooks significant evidence demonstrating the positive health outcomes for patients who have abortions.

Key Insights:

Abortion access is linked to improved patient health and well-being.
Reversing Roe v. Wade could negatively impact public health outcomes.
Evidence supports abortion as a critical component of reproductive healthcare.

Outlook:

Future legal challenges and public health implications are anticipated.
Further research is needed to fully understand the long-term effects of restricted abortion access.
Policy decisions regarding reproductive rights will continue to be a major focus.