Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 23, 2025

05:58
Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
Published on: August 29, 2018
9.0K
Priming effects in inefficient visual search: Real, but transient.
Jeremy M Wolfe1,2, Sneha B Suresh3, Alec W Dewulf4
1Visual Attention Lab, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 900 Commonwealth Ave, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. jwolfe@bwh.harvard.edu.
Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
|May 16, 2022
Summary
Target repetition speeds visual search, but this priming effect does not improve search efficiency with increasing set size. Priming may offer transient attentional guidance or speed target decisions, not guide overall search.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Visual Perception
- Neuroscience
Background:
- Visual search involves sequential trials where responses can be influenced by preceding ones.
- Target repetition typically speeds responses, while switching targets slows them, known as priming effects.
- Priming has been central to search theories, particularly in singleton tasks, but its role in inefficient search is less understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate priming effects in inefficient visual search tasks.
- To determine if repeating a target feature (color or shape) in inefficient search enhances efficiency.
- To examine whether priming influences attentional guidance or decision-making processes during search.
Main Methods:
- Experiments involved visual search for a 'T' among 'L's, with a priming feature (color or shape) irrelevant to the primary task.
- Participants completed trials where the target feature either repeated or switched from the previous trial.
- Reaction time (RT) and set size were measured to analyze priming effects and their interaction with search complexity.
Main Results:
- Additive priming effects were observed: repeating the target feature shortened reaction times on the subsequent trial.
- No interaction between priming and set size was found; the search efficiency (slope of RT x Set Size) did not improve with repeated features.
- Priming did not alter the fundamental efficiency of search as the number of items increased.
Conclusions:
- Priming in inefficient search appears to provide additive benefits, likely by transiently guiding attention or speeding target decisions.
- Priming does not seem to guide attention throughout the entire search process in these tasks.
- The findings suggest distinct mechanisms for priming in efficient versus inefficient visual search paradigms.

