Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Matched Pairs01:09

Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Matched Pairs

231
The Wilcoxon signed-rank test for matched pairs evaluates the null hypothesis by combining the ranks of differences with their signs. It essentially tests whether the median of the differences in a population of matched pairs is zero. Since the test incorporates more information than the sign test, it generally yields more trustable conclusions. This test also does not require the data to follow a normal distribution, but two conditions must be met for it to be applicable: (1) the data must...
231
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

228
Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...
228
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion01:24

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

3.5K
A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
3.5K
Statistical Hypothesis Testing01:16

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

2.1K
Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
2.1K
Sign Test for Matched Pairs01:17

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

217
The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
217
Bonferroni Test01:10

Bonferroni Test

2.9K
The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
2.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Variance Estimation for Weighted Average Treatment Effects.

Statistics in biosciences·2026
Same author

Sample Size and Power Calculations With Win Measures Based on Hierarchical Endpoints.

Statistics in medicine·2025
Same author

Assessing racial disparities in healthcare expenditure using generalized propensity score weighting.

BMC medical research methodology·2025
Same author

Causal inference in the absence of positivity: The role of overlap weights.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2024
Same author

Variance estimation for the average treatment effects on the treated and on the controls.

Statistical methods in medical research·2022
Same author

Neighborhood Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Hospitalized Heart Failure Outcomes in the American Heart Association Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure Registry.

Circulation. Heart failure·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 23, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K

Robust statistical inference for matched win statistics.

Roland A Matsouaka1,2

  • 1Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC,USA.

Statistical Methods in Medical Research
|May 17, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

New methods improve statistical inference for win statistics (net benefit, win ratio, win odds) in clinical trials. These approaches offer reliable confidence intervals and sample size calculations, especially for small samples or extreme win/loss proportions.

Keywords:
Composite endpointconfidence interval estimationmethod of variance estimates recoverynet benefitpaired data designwin oddswin ratiowin statistics

More Related Videos

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.7K
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 23, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.7K
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.3K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Methodology
  • Statistical Inference

Background:

  • Traditional time-to-first-event analysis for composite endpoints has limitations.
  • Win statistics (net benefit, win ratio, win odds) offer alternatives by prioritizing component outcomes.
  • Matched win statistics can leverage paired data or matched patient cohorts.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address limitations in statistical inference for matched win statistics.
  • To develop reliable methods for confidence intervals and hypothesis testing for win statistics.
  • To provide a sample size formula for studies using these methods.

Main Methods:

  • Introduction of a novel statistic for testing the null hypothesis of no treatment effect.
  • Application of the method of variance estimates recovery for confidence interval estimation.
  • Development of a sample size formula tailored to the proposed methods.

Main Results:

  • The proposed methods provide reliable, boundary-respecting confidence intervals for matched win statistics.
  • A new statistic enables hypothesis testing for treatment effects.
  • Simulation studies demonstrate the performance and validity of the developed methods.

Conclusions:

  • The presented methods enhance statistical inference for win statistics in clinical trials.
  • These techniques are particularly valuable for small to moderate sample sizes and extreme outcome proportions.
  • The methods offer practical solutions for analyzing prioritized composite endpoints.