Leadless pacemakers as a new alternative for pacemaker lead-related superior vena cava syndrome: A case report
Antonio Curnis1, Antonino Milidoni1, Gianmarco Arabia1
1Cardio-thoracic department, Electrophysiology and Electrostimulation Laboratory, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Insights
Superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome, often caused by pacemaker leads, can be treated with lead extraction and leadless pacemakers. This case highlights a successful treatment combining lead extraction, leadless pacing, and angioplasty for SVC restenosis.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Vascular Medicine
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome is a rare but serious condition often linked to indwelling devices like pacemakers.
- The incidence of SVC syndrome associated with central venous catheters and pacemaker/defibrillator leads is rising.
- Current treatment strategies for device-related SVC syndrome, especially after lead extraction, are not fully established.
Observation:
- Pacemaker lead extraction can cause mechanical trauma, potentially leading to venous occlusion.
- Subsequent device implantation on the opposite side may further contribute to venous occlusion.
- A clinical case of pacemaker lead-related SVC syndrome was managed at our centers.
Findings:
- The patient underwent transvenous lead extraction for SVC syndrome.
- A leadless pacemaker was implanted following lead extraction.
- Percutaneous angioplasty and stenting of the SVC and left innominate vein were performed.
Implications:
- Leadless pacemakers may offer a promising alternative to reduce the risk of SVC restenosis post-lead extraction.
- This multimodal approach (lead extraction, leadless pacing, angioplasty/stenting) effectively treated SVC syndrome in this case.
- Further research into leadless pacing could optimize management of device-related SVC syndrome.
Abstract:
Superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome is a rare disease induced by thrombosis and consequent occlusion of SVC, negatively affecting morbidity and mortality. The incidence of SVC syndrome from central venous catheters and pacemaker or defibrillator leads is increasing. Optimal treatment of pacemaker or defibrillator-related SVC syndrome is not well defined. Lead extraction causes mechanical trauma to the vessel wall. In addition, subsequent device implantation on the contralateral side can be an added factor for venous occlusion. The use of leadless pacemakers could be an interesting option to reduce the risk of SVC restenosis after lead extraction. We report a clinical case of PM leads-related SVC syndrome referred to our centers and treated with transvenous lead extraction, leadless pacemaker implantation and subsequent percutaneous angioplasty and stenting of the SVC and left innominate vein.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction


