Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 23, 2025

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
Published on: March 11, 2021
Radiomic Analysis: Study Design, Statistical Analysis, and Other Bias Mitigation Strategies
Chaya S Moskowitz1, Mattea L Welch1, Michael A Jacobs1
1From the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 485 Lexington Ave, 2nd Floor, New York, NY, NY 10017 (C.S.M.); Cancer Digital Intelligence Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada (M.L.W.); The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science and Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (M.A.J.); ERT, Pittsburgh, Pa (B.F.K.); and School of Computing, Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada (A.L.S.).
Radiomic research faces challenges from biases in study design and analysis. This review outlines common pitfalls and offers strategies to improve the reliability of radiomic findings for clinical use.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging Analysis
- Radiology
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Automated feature extraction from medical images has spurred growth in radiomic research.
- Translating radiomic findings into clinical practice is often impeded by study biases.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review common biases, sources of variability, and pitfalls in radiomic research.
- To emphasize considerations for study design and statistical analysis in radiomics.
- To describe approaches for avoiding these research pitfalls.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of statistical, radiologic, and machine learning research.
- Focus on biases in study design, analysis, and reporting.
- Identification of common pitfalls in radiomic studies.
Main Results:
- Radiomic studies are susceptible to various biases affecting translation to clinical practice.
- Study design and statistical analysis are critical areas prone to variability and pitfalls.
- Strategies exist to mitigate these issues and enhance research rigor.
Conclusions:
- Addressing biases and variability in radiomic research is crucial for clinical translation.
- Careful study design and robust statistical analysis are essential for reliable radiomic findings.
- Implementing described approaches can improve the quality and impact of radiomic studies.
Related Concept Videos
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Cancer Survival Analysis
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...

