Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Big Data Approach to Assessment of an Aldosterone-Renin Ratio for Detection of Potential Surgical Cases of Primary Aldosteronism.

Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979)·2026
Same author

Association Between Inter-Fraction Volume Changes and Patient Outcomes from Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Early-Stage Lung Cancer.

Clinical lung cancer·2025
Same author

Algorithms and software for open quantum system dynamics.

The Journal of chemical physics·2025
Same author

Predictors of Atrial Fibrillation After Thoracic Radiotherapy.

JACC. CardioOncology·2025
Same author

Avian Influenza A(H5N1) Neuraminidase Inhibition Antibodies in Healthy Adults after Exposure to Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09.

Emerging infectious diseases·2023
Same author

Patient Selection and Outcomes for Hypofractionated Accelerated Radiation and Concurrent Chemotherapy for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Clinical lung cancer·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 23, 2025

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Gynecologic Cancer
10:35

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Gynecologic Cancer

Published on: April 17, 2012

18.3K

IMRT and SBRT Treatment Planning Study for the First Clinical Biology-Guided Radiotherapy System.

Daniel Pham1, Eric Simiele2, Dylan Breitkreutz1

  • 1Department of Radiation Oncology, 6429Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment
|May 17, 2022
PubMed
Summary

The RefleXion X1 system can create clinically acceptable intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) plans. Plan quality was comparable or superior to existing systems, with acceptable delivery efficiency.

Keywords:
Dosimetryradiation dosimetrystereotactic body radiation therapystereotactic radiosurgerystereotactic radiotherapy

More Related Videos

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy
08:17

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy

Published on: June 7, 2015

15.8K
PET and MRI Guided Irradiation of a Glioblastoma Rat Model Using a Micro-irradiator
10:48

PET and MRI Guided Irradiation of a Glioblastoma Rat Model Using a Micro-irradiator

Published on: December 28, 2017

9.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 23, 2025

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Gynecologic Cancer
10:35

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Gynecologic Cancer

Published on: April 17, 2012

18.3K
Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy
08:17

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy

Published on: June 7, 2015

15.8K
PET and MRI Guided Irradiation of a Glioblastoma Rat Model Using a Micro-irradiator
10:48

PET and MRI Guided Irradiation of a Glioblastoma Rat Model Using a Micro-irradiator

Published on: December 28, 2017

9.6K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Radiotherapy Technology

Background:

  • The RefleXion X1 is the first clinical biology-guided radiation therapy (BgRT) system.
  • Evaluating its performance for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is crucial for clinical adoption.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the treatment plan quality and delivery efficiency of the RefleXion X1 system for IMRT/SBRT cases.
  • To compare plans generated on the X1 system with those from conventional treatment planning systems.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective study of 42 patient plans across 6 cancer sites.
  • Generated RefleXion X1 plans using 10mm and 20mm jaw settings, comparing them to Eclipse VMAT plans.
  • Analyzed key dosimetric metrics and beam-on time.

Main Results:

  • RefleXion X1 plans, particularly with 10mm jaws, showed equivalent or superior plan quality compared to Eclipse VMAT.
  • The X1 system achieved sharper dose fall-off, though 20mm jaw plans were acceptable.
  • Beam-on time increased by approximately 1.6x for 10mm jaw plans.

Conclusions:

  • The RefleXion X1 TPS can generate clinically acceptable IMRT/SBRT treatment plans.
  • Both 10mm and 20mm jaw settings are viable for clinical implementation.
  • The system demonstrates potential for high-quality radiation therapy delivery.