Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals01:02

¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals

1.1K
Spin systems where the difference in chemical shifts of the coupled nuclei is greater than ten times J are called first-order spin systems. These nuclei are weakly coupled, and their chemical shifts and coupling constant can generally be estimated from the well-separated signals in the spectrum.
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are...
1.1K
Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Spin State Overview01:03

Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Spin State Overview

1.2K
NMR-active nuclei have energy levels called 'spin states' that are associated with the orientations of their nuclear magnetic moments. In the absence of a magnetic field, the nuclear magnetic moments are randomly oriented, and the spin states are degenerate. When an external magnetic field is applied, the spin states have only 2 + 1 orientations available to them. A proton with = ½ has two available orientations. Similarly, for a quadrupolar nucleus with a nuclear spin value of...
1.2K
Interpreting ¹H NMR Signal Splitting: The (n + 1) Rule01:10

Interpreting ¹H NMR Signal Splitting: The (n + 1) Rule

1.5K
In the AX proton spin system, proton A can sense the two spin states of a coupled proton X, resulting in a doublet NMR signal with two peaks of equal (1:1) intensity. When proton A is coupled to two equivalent protons (AX2 spin system), the spin states of each X can be aligned with or against the external field, creating three possible scenarios. This results in a 1:2:1  triplet signal, where the central peak corresponds to the chemical shift of A and is twice as large or intense as the...
1.5K
¹H NMR: Complex Splitting01:13

¹H NMR: Complex Splitting

1.4K
A proton M that is coupled to a proton X results in doublet signals for M. However, NMR-active nuclei can be simultaneously coupled to more than one nonequivalent nucleus. When M is coupled to a second proton A, such as in styrene oxide, each peak in the doublet is split into another doublet.
Splitting diagrams or splitting tree diagrams are routinely used to depict such complex couplings. While drawing splitting diagrams, the splitting with the larger coupling constant is usually applied...
1.4K
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview01:08

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview

1.0K
In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
1.0K
¹H NMR: Pople Notation01:09

¹H NMR: Pople Notation

1.9K
The Pople nomenclature system classifies spin systems based on the difference between their chemical shifts. Coupled spins are denoted by capital letters with subscripts indicating the number of equivalent nuclei. When the coupled nuclei have well-separated chemical shifts, they are assigned letters that are far apart in the alphabet, such as A and X. When the difference in chemical shifts is small, coupled nuclei are named using adjacent letters of the alphabet (AB, MN, or XY).
A proton...
1.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ultrathin selenium nanorods from helical phases: a quantum chemical study using line group theory.

Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations and advances·2025
Same author

Evidence of Sharp Transitions between Octahedral and Capped Trigonal Prism States of the Solvation Shell of the Aqueous Fe<sup>3+</sup> Ion.

The journal of physical chemistry letters·2024
Same author

Mixing Linear Polymers with Rings and Catenanes: Bulk and Interfacial Behavior.

Macromolecules·2023
Same author

Phase behavior and dynamics in a colloid-polymer mixture under spherical confinement.

Soft matter·2023
Same author

Unidirectional Droplet Propulsion onto Gradient Brushes without External Energy Supply.

Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids·2023
Same author

Bulk phase behavior and interfacial properties of binary mixtures of Lennard-Jones chains and solvent: a density functional theory study.

Soft matter·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 23, 2025

Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser
09:00

Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser

Published on: June 28, 2018

10.1K

Spin splitting in monoperiodic systems described by magnetic line groups.

Sergei A Egorov1,2, Daniel B Litvin3, Andrei V Bandura4

  • 1Department of Chemistry, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22901, United States of America.

Journal of Physics. Condensed Matter : an Institute of Physics Journal
|May 17, 2022
PubMed
Summary

This study classifies magnetic line groups, revealing that specific antiferromagnetic structures allow electrically induced spin splitting. This finding is crucial for understanding spin dynamics in novel magnetic materials.

Keywords:
density functional theorygroup theorymagneticnanotubesspin splitting

More Related Videos

High-Temperature and High-Pressure In situ Magic Angle Spinning Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
08:55

High-Temperature and High-Pressure In situ Magic Angle Spinning Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

Published on: October 9, 2020

5.7K
Spectral and Angle-Resolved Magneto-Optical Characterization of Photonic Nanostructures
08:01

Spectral and Angle-Resolved Magneto-Optical Characterization of Photonic Nanostructures

Published on: November 21, 2019

7.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 23, 2025

Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser
09:00

Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser

Published on: June 28, 2018

10.1K
High-Temperature and High-Pressure In situ Magic Angle Spinning Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
08:55

High-Temperature and High-Pressure In situ Magic Angle Spinning Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

Published on: October 9, 2020

5.7K
Spectral and Angle-Resolved Magneto-Optical Characterization of Photonic Nanostructures
08:01

Spectral and Angle-Resolved Magneto-Optical Characterization of Photonic Nanostructures

Published on: November 21, 2019

7.2K

Area of Science:

  • Condensed matter physics
  • Solid-state physics
  • Materials science

Background:

  • Magnetic groups classify crystalline materials with magnetic ordering.
  • Spin splitting is a key phenomenon in spintronics and quantum computing.
  • Previous work classified magnetic space, layer, and rod groups.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To classify all 81 magnetic line group families.
  • To identify which magnetic line groups support electrically induced spin splitting.
  • To provide a theoretical and computational analysis of spin splitting in a specific material.

Main Methods:

  • Group theoretical classification of magnetic line groups.
  • Analysis of symmetry operations related to spin splitting.
  • First-principles density functional theory (DFT) calculations.

Main Results:

  • All 81 magnetic line group families were categorized into seven spin splitting prototypes.
  • Electrically induced (Pekar-Rashba) spin splitting is predicted for magnetic line groups of type I and III.
  • Spin splitting was theoretically analyzed and computationally confirmed in CoO nanotubes.

Conclusions:

  • The classification provides a framework for predicting spin splitting in magnetic materials.
  • Magnetic line groups of type I and III are promising candidates for spintronic applications.
  • Ab initio calculations validate the group theoretical predictions for spin splitting.