Transitioning From S1P Receptor Modulators to B Cell-Depleting Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis: Clinical,

William M Rowles1, Wan-Yu Hsu1, Kira McPolin1

  • 1From the UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences (W.M.R., W.-Y.H., K.M., A.L., C.-Y.G., A.J.G., J.M.G., R.M.B.), Division of Neuroimmunology and Glial Biology, Department of Neurology, Department of Clinical Pharmacy (S.M.), and UCSF Department of Ophthalmology (A.J.G.), University of California, San Francisco.

Abstract

Insights

Transitioning from sphingosine-1-receptor (S1P) modulators to anti-CD20 therapies in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients may not require a long interval for immune reconstitution. Shorter intervals between treatments appear safe and may reduce relapse risk.

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Immunology
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) often switch from oral sphingosine-1-receptor (S1P) modulators to anti-CD20 therapies.
  • The optimal timing for this transition is unclear, balancing rebound disease activity and immune reconstitution.
  • This study investigates inflammatory activity during the transition from fingolimod to anti-CD20 treatments in a real-world MS cohort.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the relationship between inflammatory activity and the transition period from fingolimod to anti-CD20 therapies.
  • To assess relapse rates, MRI activity, lymphocyte count recovery, and infections in MS patients undergoing this switch.
  • To inform clinical practice regarding the timing of switching disease-modifying therapies in MS.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of medical records for 108 MS patients transitioning from fingolimod to rituximab or ocrelizumab (2010-2020).
  • Analysis of time intervals between fingolimod discontinuation and anti-CD20 initiation.
  • Primary outcome: clinical relapses; secondary outcomes: MRI activity, absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) recovery, and infections.

Main Results:

  • A median interval of 28 days was observed between fingolimod and anti-CD20 therapy.
  • Six of 51 patients (11.8%) with intervals >1 month relapsed within 6 months of discontinuation; none with shorter intervals did.
  • Relapses post-anti-CD20 initiation were infrequent (3.7%), and ALC normalized in most patients (89/92) regardless of the treatment interval.

Conclusions:

  • Delaying anti-CD20 therapy to monitor ALC after S1P modulator discontinuation may not be necessary and could increase rebound risk.
  • A rapid switch to anti-CD20 treatment is feasible and potentially safer.
  • ALC monitoring could be performed after initiating anti-CD20 therapy instead of delaying treatment.