Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

14.9K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.9K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

253
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
253
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.2K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.2K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

5.8K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.8K
Groupthink01:34

Groupthink

45.7K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
45.7K
Impact of Individuals on a Group01:25

Impact of Individuals on a Group

7
In social psychology, the interplay between individuals and groups is a central concern, particularly regarding how individual actions and characteristics influence group processes and outcomes. While much research emphasizes the group's power in shaping individual behavior, it is equally significant to understand how individuals contribute to the functioning, development, and success of groups.Individual Roles in Group Productivity and Decision-MakingIndividuals are not passive participants in...
7

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Similarity Matching Networks: Hebbian Learning and Convergence Over Multiple Timescales.

Neural computation·2026
Same author

Firing Rate Models as Associative Memory: Synaptic Design for Robust Retrieval.

Neural computation·2025
Same author

Input-driven dynamics for robust memory retrieval in Hopfield networks.

Science advances·2025
Same author

Positive Competitive Networks for Sparse Reconstruction.

Neural computation·2024
Same author

Computationally Designed Molecules Modulate ALS-Related Amyloidogenic TDP-43<sub>307-319</sub> Aggregation.

ACS chemical neuroscience·2023
Same author

Multistability and anomalies in oscillator models of lossy power grids.

Nature communications·2022
Same journal

Multiomics Profiling During Autoimmune Demyelination Highlights a Complex Regulatory Role for Ataxin-1 in B Cells.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2026
Same journal

Global Trends in Light Pollution and Their Relationship With Socioeconomic Factors.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2026
Same journal

Wired for Corruption: Inter-Brain Synchrony Encodes Bribery-Related Value Information and Predicts Bribery Agreement.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2026
Same journal

LM-YOLO: A Lightweight Multi-Scale Enhanced Model for Forest Smoke Detection Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2026
Same journal

Polyrhythm Perception and Production: A Scoping Review.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2026
Same journal

DARTS-CNN-BiLSTM: Intelligent Fault Diagnosis for Computer Numerical Control Machine Tool Feed System.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 23, 2025

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.5K

Predictive models for human-AI nexus in group decision making.

Omid Askarisichani1, Francesco Bullo2,3, Noah E Friedkin3,4

  • 1Department of Computer Science, University of California, Santa Barbara, California, USA.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
|May 17, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This review explores effective human-AI teamwork, focusing on integrating artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) decision-making with human expertise in health and learning. It highlights key factors for successful human-AI collaboration in group settings.

Keywords:
decision makinghuman-AI teamsmachine learning

More Related Videos

A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants
06:28

A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants

Published on: August 26, 2018

6.1K
Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention
06:37

Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention

Published on: December 15, 2023

4.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 23, 2025

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.5K
A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants
06:28

A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants

Published on: August 26, 2018

6.1K
Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention
06:37

Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention

Published on: December 15, 2023

4.2K

Area of Science:

  • Computer Science
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Decision Science

Background:

  • Machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) significantly impact various life domains, including health and learning.
  • Human-AI interactions are crucial for decision-making, combining algorithmic insights with human judgment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address critical questions regarding the regulation and evaluation of AI resources.
  • To identify effective communication and coordination strategies for optimal human-AI teamwork.
  • To highlight essential factors for managing group decision-making involving humans and AI.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current literature on human-AI interaction and decision-making.
  • Analysis of factors influencing the integration of AI/ML in group settings.
  • Identification of best practices for human-AI collaboration.

Main Results:

  • Effective human-AI teamwork requires careful consideration of social and interpersonal factors alongside algorithmic outputs.
  • Establishing clear protocols for AI evaluation and regulation is essential.
  • Developing robust communication and coordination mechanisms enhances collaborative decision-making.

Conclusions:

  • Successful implementation of AI in group decision-making necessitates a balanced approach, leveraging both AI capabilities and human expertise.
  • Further research is needed to define optimal protocols for AI governance and human-AI interaction design.