Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 22, 2025

Postural Organization of Gait Initiation for Biomechanical Analysis Using Force Platform Recordings
Published on: July 26, 2022
The choice of reference point for computing sagittal plane angular momentum affects inferences about dynamic balance
Chang Liu1, Sungwoo Park2, James Finley1,3
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.
The choice of reference point (center of mass vs. base of support) does not alter how peak angular momentum relates to walking balance disturbances. However, different reference points may offer unique insights into dynamic balance control strategies.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics
- Human locomotion
- Robotics
Background:
- Whole-body angular momentum in the sagittal plane is crucial for assessing dynamic balance during walking.
- Calculating angular momentum requires selecting a reference point, commonly the center of mass (CoM) in biomechanics, but the center of pressure in robotics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether the choice of reference point (CoM vs. base of support) affects the interpretation of dynamic balance control during perturbed walking.
- To determine if different reference points influence the understanding of intersegmental coordination patterns during balance recovery.
Main Methods:
- Eleven healthy adults walked on a treadmill with induced balance disturbances (accelerations).
- Sagittal plane angular momentum was calculated using two reference points: center of mass (CoM) and the leading edge of the base of support.
- Principal component analysis was employed to assess the impact of reference point choice on coordination pattern interpretation.
Main Results:
- Peak angular momentum during perturbed walking was consistently correlated with perturbation amplitude, irrespective of the reference point used.
- The relationship between peak angular momentum and perturbation amplitude showed no significant difference between the CoM and base of support reference points.
- Analysis using the CoM facilitates understanding limb momentum contributions, while the base of support may better reveal inverted-pendulum dynamics.
Conclusions:
- The choice of reference point does not fundamentally alter the relationship between whole-body angular momentum and the magnitude of balance disturbances.
- Each reference point offers distinct advantages for interpreting dynamic balance control mechanisms during walking perturbations.
- CoM-based analysis aids in understanding limb coordination for overall momentum regulation, while base of support analysis may highlight gait mechanics.
Related Concept Videos
Angular Momentum about an Arbitrary Axis
The velocity of a mass element comprises its translational velocity and the relative velocity instigated by the body's rotation. Substituting the velocity equation into...
Angular Momentum and Principle Axes of Inertia
To put this equation into simpler terms, it can be reconfigured using rectangular coordinates. This involves choosing an alternative set of XYZ axes that are arbitrarily inclined with respect to the reference frame. The process of deriving the rectangular...
Angular Momentum: Rigid Body
This calculation can get complicated when tiny particles within the rigid body are not rotating in the same plane but have...
Principle of Angular Impulse and Momentum
Equilibrium and Balance
Angular Momentum: Single Particle

