VERONICA: Randomized Phase II Study of Fulvestrant and Venetoclax in ER-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Post-CDK4/6

Geoffrey J Lindeman1,2,3, Tharu M Fernando4, Rebecca Bowen5

  • 1Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.

Abstract

Insights

Venetoclax (BCL2 inhibitor) did not improve outcomes for metastatic breast cancer patients post-CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy. Further research is needed to explore its potential in specific patient subgroups.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • The B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2) inhibitor venetoclax shows promise in hematologic cancers, but its efficacy in solid tumors remains unestablished.
  • Estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer often becomes resistant to endocrine therapy and cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of venetoclax combined with fulvestrant in patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer following progression on CDK4/6 inhibitors.
  • To assess clinical benefit rate (CBR) and progression-free survival (PFS) as primary and secondary endpoints.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized phase II clinical trial (VERONICA) enrolled pre-/postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer.
  • Participants were randomized to receive either venetoclax plus fulvestrant or fulvestrant alone.
  • Exploratory analyses included tumor BCL2 and BCL extra-large (BCLXL) expression and PIK3CA mutational status.

Main Results:

  • Venetoclax did not significantly improve the clinical benefit rate (CBR) compared to fulvestrant alone (11.8% vs 13.7%).
  • Median progression-free survival (PFS) was similar between arms (2.69 months vs 1.94 months).
  • A trend towards benefit was observed in patients with high BCL2 expression, a high BCL2/BCLXL ratio, or wild-type PIK3CA.

Conclusions:

  • Venetoclax plus fulvestrant does not demonstrate clinical utility in endocrine therapy-resistant, CDK4/6 inhibitor-refractory metastatic breast cancer.
  • The results suggest a potential compensatory dependence on BCLXL in this patient population, warranting further investigation.

Related Concept Videos

Treatment Resistant Cancers02:56

Treatment Resistant Cancers

Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the United States. A cancer cell is genetically unstable and hence can mutate faster. They can also modify their microenvironment and escape immune surveillance. The difficulties in treating cancer are further compounded by the emergence of rapid resistance to anticancer drugs. The most common ways to attain resistance in cancer cells include alteration in drug transport and metabolism, modification of drug target, elevated DNA damage response, or...
Treatment Resistent Cancers02:56

Treatment Resistent Cancers

Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the United States. A cancer cell is genetically unstable and hence can mutate faster. They can also modify their microenvironment and escape immune surveillance. The difficulties in treating cancer are further compounded by the emergence of rapid resistance to anticancer drugs. The most common ways to attain resistance in cancer cells include alteration in drug transport and metabolism, modification of drug target, elevated DNA damage response, or...
Clinical Trials: Overview01:11

Clinical Trials: Overview

Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...