Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2026

Generation of Prostate Cancer Patient Derived Xenograft Models from Circulating Tumor Cells
Published on: October 20, 2015
VERONICA: Randomized Phase II Study of Fulvestrant and Venetoclax in ER-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Post-CDK4/6
Geoffrey J Lindeman1,2,3, Tharu M Fernando4, Rebecca Bowen5
1Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Purpose:
Despite promising activity in hematopoietic malignancies, efficacy of the B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2) inhibitor venetoclax in solid tumors is unknown. We report the prespecified VERONICA primary results, a randomized phase II clinical trial evaluating venetoclax and fulvestrant in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer, post-cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitor progression.
Patients And Methods:
Pre-/postmenopausal females ≥18 years were randomized 1:1 to venetoclax (800 mg orally daily) plus fulvestrant (500 mg intramuscular; cycle 1: days 1 and 15; subsequent 28-day cycles: day 1) or fulvestrant alone. The primary endpoint was clinical benefit rate (CBR); secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and safety. Exploratory biomarker analyses included BCL2 and BCL extra-large (BCLXL) tumor expression, and PIK3CA circulating tumor DNA mutational status.
Results:
At primary analysis (cutoff: August 5, 2020; n = 103), venetoclax did not significantly improve CBR [venetoclax plus fulvestrant: 11.8% (n = 6/51; 95% confidence interval (CI), 4.44-23.87); fulvestrant: 13.7% (7/51; 5.70-26.26); risk difference -1.96% (95% CI, -16.86 to 12.94)]. Median PFS was 2.69 months (95% CI, 1.94-3.71) with venetoclax plus fulvestrant versus 1.94 months (1.84-3.55) with fulvestrant (stratified HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.61-1.45; P = 0.7853). Overall survival data were not mature. A nonsignificant improvement of CBR and PFS was observed in patients whose tumors had strong BCL2 expression (IHC 3+), a BCL2/BCLXL Histoscore ratio ≥1, or PIK3CA-wild-type status.
Conclusions:
Our findings do not indicate clinical utility for venetoclax plus fulvestrant in endocrine therapy-resistant, CDK4/6 inhibitor-refractory metastatic breast tumors, but suggest possible increased dependence on BCLXL in this setting.
Insights
Venetoclax (BCL2 inhibitor) did not improve outcomes for metastatic breast cancer patients post-CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy. Further research is needed to explore its potential in specific patient subgroups.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- The B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2) inhibitor venetoclax shows promise in hematologic cancers, but its efficacy in solid tumors remains unestablished.
- Estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer often becomes resistant to endocrine therapy and cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of venetoclax combined with fulvestrant in patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer following progression on CDK4/6 inhibitors.
- To assess clinical benefit rate (CBR) and progression-free survival (PFS) as primary and secondary endpoints.
Main Methods:
- A randomized phase II clinical trial (VERONICA) enrolled pre-/postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer.
- Participants were randomized to receive either venetoclax plus fulvestrant or fulvestrant alone.
- Exploratory analyses included tumor BCL2 and BCL extra-large (BCLXL) expression and PIK3CA mutational status.
Main Results:
- Venetoclax did not significantly improve the clinical benefit rate (CBR) compared to fulvestrant alone (11.8% vs 13.7%).
- Median progression-free survival (PFS) was similar between arms (2.69 months vs 1.94 months).
- A trend towards benefit was observed in patients with high BCL2 expression, a high BCL2/BCLXL ratio, or wild-type PIK3CA.
Conclusions:
- Venetoclax plus fulvestrant does not demonstrate clinical utility in endocrine therapy-resistant, CDK4/6 inhibitor-refractory metastatic breast cancer.
- The results suggest a potential compensatory dependence on BCLXL in this patient population, warranting further investigation.
More Related Videos
06:44Generation of Prostate Cancer Cell Models of Resistance to the Anti-mitotic Agent Docetaxel
Published on: September 8, 2017
06:22Isolation of Viable Adipocytes and Stromal Vascular Fraction from Human Visceral Adipose Tissue Suitable for RNA Analysis and Macrophage Phenotyping
Published on: October 27, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Treatment Resistent Cancers
Clinical Trials: Overview