Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 22, 2025

Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock: a critical appraisal
Giulia Masiero1, Francesco Cardaioli1, Giuseppe Tarantini1
1Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua Medical School, Padua, Italy.
Insights
Optimal treatment for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with cardiogenic shock (CS) involves early mechanical circulatory support (MCS) and extensive revascularization, alongside specialized shock teams, to improve survival rates in multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD).
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Critical Care Medicine
Background:
- Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) carries a high mortality rate, even with current treatments.
- Multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD) presents unique challenges in AMI-CS patients.
- Current guidelines suggest culprit lesion-only (CLO) revascularization in AMI-CS, but this is based on limited evidence.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review current evidence on optimal revascularization strategies for MVD in patients with AMI-CS.
- To assess the role of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices in managing AMI-CS.
- To highlight the importance of integrated care approaches, including shock teams and healthcare networks.
Main Methods:
- In-depth review of existing literature and observational data.
- Analysis of outcomes related to different revascularization strategies (CLO vs. extensive).
- Evaluation of the impact of early MCS implantation on patient survival.
Main Results:
- Emerging evidence suggests early MCS implantation prior to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may improve outcomes.
- Extensive revascularization, rather than CLO, appears beneficial in select AMI-CS patients.
- The implementation of dedicated shock teams and coordinated care networks is crucial.
Conclusions:
- Optimal management of AMI-CS with MVD requires a shift towards early MCS and comprehensive revascularization.
- Multidisciplinary collaboration and system-level organization are essential for improving survival.
- Further research is needed to refine treatment guidelines for this high-risk population.
Introduction:
Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) is a life-threatening condition frequently encounter in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD).
Areas Covered:
Despite prompt revascularization, in particular percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and therapeutic and technological advances, the mortality rate for CS related to AMI remains high. Differently from hemodynamically stable setting, a culprit lesion-only (CLO) revascularization strategy is currently suggested in AMI-CS patients, based on the results of a recent randomized evidence burdened by several limitations and conflicting results from non-randomized studies. Furthermore, mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices have raised as a key therapeutic option in CS, especially in case of an early implantation without delaying revascularization and before irreversible organ damage has occurred. We provide an in-depth review of current evidences on optimal revascularization strategies of multivessel CAD in infarct-related CS, assessing the role of MCS devices, and highlighting the importance of shock teams and medical care system networks to effectively impact on clinical outcomes.
Expert Opinion:
Emerging observational experience suggested that an early implantation of MCS (prior to PCI), the performance of an extensive revascularization and the implementation of shock teams and networks are key factors for improving clinical outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Blood Pressure Imbalances and Circulatory Shock
Blood Pressure: Hypertension and Hypotension
Normal blood pressure is 120/80 mm Hg. Elevated blood pressure is 120-129/under 80 mm Hg. Hypertension, warranting treatment at 130/80 mm Hg, is often asymptomatic and can lead to severe cardiovascular events, aneurysms, peripheral arterial disease, chronic renal disease, or cardiac...
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies

