Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

7.2K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
7.2K
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value01:13

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

697
In healthcare diagnostics, laboratory tests play a crucial role in identifying and diagnosing a wide range of medical conditions. However, interpreting test results is not always straightforward. An abnormal test result does not always confirm the presence of a disease, just as a normal result does not guarantee its absence. To assess the reliability of these diagnostic tools, healthcare practitioners rely on two key statistical indicators: sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity is the...
697
Convolution Properties I01:20

Convolution Properties I

250
Convolution computations can be simplified by utilizing their inherent properties.
The commutative property reveals that the input and the impulse response of an LTI (Linear Time-Invariant) system can be interchanged without affecting the output:
250
Convolution Properties II01:17

Convolution Properties II

296
The important convolution properties include width, area, differentiation, and integration properties.
The width property indicates that if the durations of input signals are T1 and T2, then the width of the output response equals the sum of both durations, irrespective of the shapes of the two functions. For instance, convolving two rectangular pulses with durations of 2 seconds and 1 second results in a function with a width of 3 seconds.
The area property asserts that the area under the...
296
Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient01:10

Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient

2.5K
In a linear calibration curve, there is a value called the calibration coefficient, denoted by 'r,' which measures the strength and the direction of association between two variables. The correlation coefficient value ranges from −1 to +1. A value of +1 indicates a perfect positive linear correlation, −1 denotes a perfect negative correlation, and 0 implies no correlation between the two variables. A positive correlation value establishes that as one variable increases, the...
2.5K
Classification of Signals01:30

Classification of Signals

940
In signal processing, signals are classified based on various characteristics: continuous-time versus discrete-time, periodic versus aperiodic, analog versus digital, and causal versus noncausal. Each category highlights distinct properties crucial for understanding and manipulating signals.
A continuous-time signal holds a value at every instant in time, representing information seamlessly. In contrast, a discrete-time signal holds values only at specific moments, often denoted as x(n), where...
940

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Contrast sensitivity in multimodal large language models: A psychophysics-inspired evaluation.

Neural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society·2026
Same author

A Turing Test for artificial nets devoted to vision.

Frontiers in artificial intelligence·2026
Same author

RAID-Dataset: human responses to affine image distortions and Gaussian noise.

Scientific data·2026
Same author

Higher-Order Triadic Interactions: Insights Into the Multiscale Network Organization in Schizophrenia.

Human brain mapping·2025
Same author

A Neural Model for V1 That Incorporates Dendritic Nonlinearities and Backpropagating Action Potentials.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2025
Same author

Beyond Pairwise Connections in Complex Systems: Insights into the Human Multiscale Psychotic Brain.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 22, 2025

Data Acquisition Protocol for Determining Embedded Sensitivity Functions
07:46

Data Acquisition Protocol for Determining Embedded Sensitivity Functions

Published on: April 20, 2016

6.2K

Contrast sensitivity functions in autoencoders.

Qiang Li1,2, Alex Gomez-Villa3,4, Marcelo Bertalmío5,6

  • 1Image Processing Lab, Parc Cientific, Universitat de Valéncia, Spain.

Journal of Vision
|May 19, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Artificial neural networks, specifically autoencoders, can develop human-like contrast sensitivity functions (CSFs) when trained on basic retinal image enhancement tasks. However, deeper networks may perform worse at replicating these human visual phenomena.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Advancing Alzheimer's Research – Exploring Early Detection and Multi-Omics Approaches
09:47

Author Spotlight: Advancing Alzheimer's Research – Exploring Early Detection and Multi-Omics Approaches

Published on: December 15, 2023

1.3K
Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications
03:31

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications

Published on: December 15, 2023

652

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 22, 2025

Data Acquisition Protocol for Determining Embedded Sensitivity Functions
07:46

Data Acquisition Protocol for Determining Embedded Sensitivity Functions

Published on: April 20, 2016

6.2K
Author Spotlight: Advancing Alzheimer's Research – Exploring Early Detection and Multi-Omics Approaches
09:47

Author Spotlight: Advancing Alzheimer's Research – Exploring Early Detection and Multi-Omics Approaches

Published on: December 15, 2023

1.3K
Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications
03:31

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications

Published on: December 15, 2023

652

Area of Science:

  • Computational neuroscience
  • Computer vision
  • Human visual perception

Background:

  • Human contrast sensitivity functions (CSFs) are fundamental to visual perception.
  • Previous theories suggested CSFs arise from efficient retinal image analysis.
  • Artificial neural networks (ANNs) are increasingly used to model visual processing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To reassess the role of low-level vision tasks in explaining human CSFs.
  • To investigate the utility of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) in modeling CSFs.
  • To explore the relationship between network depth, task optimization, and human-like visual phenomena.

Main Methods:

  • Trained autoencoder CNNs on various low-level image processing tasks (e.g., noise/blur removal).
  • Evaluated the ability of trained CNNs to replicate human CSFs across spatiotemporal and chromatic dimensions.
  • Compared the performance of different CNN architectures and task objectives.

Main Results:

  • Autoencoders trained on noise and blur removal tasks successfully developed human-like CSFs.
  • The best-performing CNN model reproduced CSFs with an 11% root mean square error.
  • Deeper CNNs optimized for quantitative goals showed reduced ability to replicate human-like CSFs.

Conclusions:

  • Low-level vision tasks, when modeled by appropriate CNNs, can explain human CSFs.
  • Network architecture and task optimization goals are critical for modeling human vision accurately.
  • Caution is advised when using ANNs in vision science due to potential limitations in simplified units or architectures.