Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Factorial Design02:01

Factorial Design

13.3K
Factorial Analysis is an experimental design that applies Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistical procedures to examine a change in a dependent variable due to more than one independent variable, also known as factors. Changes in worker productivity can be reasoned, for example, to be influenced by salary and other conditions, such as skill level. One way to test this hypothesis is by categorizing salary into three levels (low, moderate, and high) and skills sets into two levels (entry level...
13.3K
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

3.5K
One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
3.5K
One-Way ANOVA01:18

One-Way ANOVA

8.1K
One-way ANOVA analyzes more than three samples categorized by one factor. For example, it can compare the average mileage of sports bikes. Here, the data is categorized by one factor - the company. However, one-way ANOVA cannot be used to simultaneously compare the sample mean of three or more samples categorized by two factors. An example of two factors would be sports bikes from different companies driven in different terrains, such as a desert or snowy landscape. Here, two-way ANOVA is used...
8.1K
Compacting Factor test01:22

Compacting Factor test

258
The compacting factor test is a method used to assess the workability of concrete. It is  especially suitable for concrete mixes containing aggregates up to one and a half inches in size. This test involves specialized equipment consisting of two truncated cone-shaped hoppers and a cylinder, all with polished interior surfaces to minimize friction.
The procedure begins by placing concrete into the upper hopper without any compaction. Once filled, the bottom door of this hopper is opened,...
258
Two-Way ANOVA01:17

Two-Way ANOVA

2.8K
The two-way ANOVA is an extension of the one-way ANOVA. It is a statistical test performed on three or more samples categorized by two factors - a row factor and a column factor. Ronald Fischer mentioned it in 1925 in his book 'Statistical Methods for Researchers.'
The two-way ANOVA analysis initially begins by stating the null hypothesis that there is an interaction effect between the two factors of a dataset. This effect can be visualized using line segments formed by joining the...
2.8K
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes

5.9K
One-way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples of unequal sizes. However, calculations get complicated when sample sizes are not always the same. So, while performing ANOVA with unequal samples size, the following equation is used:
5.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Medical trainees' emotions and their effects on perceptions of performance and team mood in team-based simulations.

The British journal of educational psychology·2025
Same author

Want to try a registered report? Here are our lessons learned.

Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale·2024
Same author

Construct validity and the validity of replication studies: A systematic review.

The American psychologist·2022
Same author

Addressing a crisis of generalizability with large-scale construct validation.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2022
Same author

Facial Impressions Are Predicted by the Structure of Group Stereotypes.

Psychological science·2021
Same author

An approach to structural equation modeling with both factors and components: Integrated generalized structured component analysis.

Psychological methods·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 22, 2025

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.0K

Measurement invariance testing using confirmatory factor analysis and alignment optimization: A tutorial for

Raymond Luong1, Jessica Kay Flake1

  • 1Department of Psychology, McGill University.

Psychological Methods
|May 19, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study compares traditional multiple-group confirmatory factor analyses with the newer alignment method for testing measurement invariance. It offers guidance for researchers on choosing and documenting their chosen approach for psychological research.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

924
Multimedia Battery for Assessment of Cognitive and Basic Skills in Mathematics BM-PROMA
10:58

Multimedia Battery for Assessment of Cognitive and Basic Skills in Mathematics BM-PROMA

Published on: August 28, 2021

4.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 22, 2025

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.0K
Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

924
Multimedia Battery for Assessment of Cognitive and Basic Skills in Mathematics BM-PROMA
10:58

Multimedia Battery for Assessment of Cognitive and Basic Skills in Mathematics BM-PROMA

Published on: August 28, 2021

4.6K

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Quantitative Psychology
  • Psychometrics

Background:

  • Measurement invariance ensures scale properties are consistent across groups, contexts, or time, a critical assumption in psychological research.
  • Traditional methods using multiple-group confirmatory factor analyses (MG-CFA) are complex, strict, and pose multiplicity challenges.
  • The alignment method offers a more automated alternative, accommodating multiple groups with fewer researcher decisions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a clear comparison of traditional MG-CFA and the alignment method for testing measurement invariance.
  • To address the lack of accessible resources detailing the methodological differences, assumptions, and limitations of both approaches.
  • To offer practical guidance for researchers on selecting and documenting their measurement invariance testing strategies.

Main Methods:

  • Side-by-side overview of the concepts, assumptions, advantages, and limitations of both traditional MG-CFA and the alignment method.
  • Development of four key considerations to aid researchers in choosing an appropriate method and documenting their analysis plan.
  • Illustrative example using an open dataset, R, and Mplus to demonstrate step-by-step application and preregistration.

Main Results:

  • Detailed comparison highlighting the distinct assumptions, estimation techniques, and limitations of each method.
  • A practical framework (four key considerations) to guide method selection and preregistration.
  • Step-by-step tutorial for implementing both methods using R and Mplus with an open dataset.

Conclusions:

  • Researchers should carefully consider the assumptions and practicalities of both traditional MG-CFA and the alignment method.
  • The study provides a practical guide and example preregistration to enhance transparency and reproducibility in measurement invariance testing.
  • Recommendations are offered for choosing between methods and future directions for psychometric research.