Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Individual differences in auditory capabilities. I.

D M Johnson, C S Watson, J K Jensen

    The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
    |February 1, 1987
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    A content review of state tobacco pre-emption laws in the US.

    Public health·2023
    Same author

    A massive rock and ice avalanche caused the 2021 disaster at Chamoli, Indian Himalaya.

    Science (New York, N.Y.)·2021
    Same author

    Radioimmunoassay of somatomedin-C in the baboon (Papio cynocephalus): A comparison of multiple techniques of measurement.

    American journal of primatology·2020
    Same author

    Growing pains: Maturity associated variation in injury risk in academy football.

    European journal of sport science·2019
    Same author

    Training and assessment of anaesthesiologist skills: The contrasting groups method and mastery learning levels.

    Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica·2018
    Same author

    Simulation-based point-of-care ultrasound training: a matter of competency rather than volume.

    Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica·2018
    Same journal

    High-resolution depth estimation for multiple wideband sources in deep sea via sparse Bayesian learninga).

    The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
    Same journal

    Depression markers in speech: An approach based on tract variables dynamics.

    The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
    Same journal

    The oyster toadfish (Opsanus tau) alters active and diurnal calling amid vessel noise in New York City.

    The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
    Same journal

    Experimental noise characterisation of phase-locked tandem-rotor in edgewise flight.

    The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
    Same journal

    The tune-text-temporal synergy: Prosodic effects of final segmental weakening in Neapolitan.

    The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
    Same journal

    Monitoring vessel movement above critical offshore infrastructure using distributed acoustic sensing.

    The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
    See all related articles

    Individual differences in auditory performance, particularly in temporal processing, were identified in adults with normal hearing. These persistent differences suggest distinct underlying abilities influencing auditory tasks.

    Area of Science:

    • Auditory neuroscience
    • Psychoacoustics
    • Human auditory perception

    Background:

    • Understanding individual variability in auditory processing is crucial for identifying potential clinical markers.
    • Previous research suggests that temporal processing abilities can vary significantly among individuals.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate individual differences in auditory performance across various psychoacoustic tasks.
    • To assess the impact of training and feedback on these individual differences.
    • To explore the relationship between different auditory abilities and underlying independent cognitive functions.

    Main Methods:

    • Twenty-eight audiometrically normal adults participated in a battery of auditory tests.
    • Tests included quiet and masked thresholds, and discrimination of simple to complex temporal patterns.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Training involved adaptive threshold-tracking methods with trial-by-trial feedback.

    • Main Results:

    • Good test-retest reliability was observed across all auditory tasks.
    • Individual differences in psychoacoustic performance persisted despite training and feedback.
    • Significant individual differences were noted in temporal-sequence discrimination tasks.
    • High correlations were found within classes of tests (e.g., frequency discrimination) and between certain classes (e.g., frequency and sequence discrimination).

    Conclusions:

    • Individual differences in auditory performance are partly attributable to distinct underlying abilities.
    • Temporal-sequence discrimination may represent a clinically significant aspect of auditory processing.
    • Auditory abilities are not monolithic, but rather composed of independent, yet sometimes correlated, functions.