Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 22, 2025

Large Scale Energy Efficient Sensor Network Routing Using a Quantum Processor Unit
Published on: September 8, 2023
DACFL: Dynamic Average Consensus-Based Federated Learning in Decentralized Sensors Network
Zhikun Chen1, Daofeng Li1, Jinkang Zhu1,2
1Department of Electronic Engineering and Information Science, School of Information Science and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China, No. 96 Jinzhai Road, Hefei 230026, China.
Abstract:
Federated Learning (FL) is a privacy-preserving way to utilize the sensitive data generated by smart sensors of user devices, where a central parameter server (PS) coordinates multiple user devices to train a global model. However, relying on centralized topology poses challenges when applying FL in a sensors network, including imbalanced communication congestion and possible single point of failure, especially on the PS. To alleviate these problems, we devise a Dynamic Average Consensus-based Federated Learning (DACFL) for implementing FL in a decentralized sensors network. Different from existing studies that replace the model aggregation roughly with neighbors' average, we first transform the FL model aggregation, which is the most intractable in a decentralized topology, into the dynamic average consensus problem by treating a local training procedure as a discrete-time series.We then employ the first-order dynamic average consensus (FODAC) to estimate the average model, which not only solves the model aggregation for DACFL but also ensures model consistency as much as possible. To improve the performance with non-i.i.d data, each user also takes the neighbors' average model as its next-round initialization, which prevents the possible local over-fitting. Besides, we also provide a basic theoretical analysis of DACFL on the premise of i.i.d data. The result validates the feasibility of DACFL in both time-invariant and time-varying topologies and declares that DACFL outperforms existing studies, including CDSGD and D-PSGD, in most cases. Take the result on Fashion-MNIST as a numerical example, with i.i.d data, our DACFL achieves 19∼34% and 3∼10% increases in average accuracy; with non-i.i.d data, our DACFL achieves 30∼50% and 0∼10% increases in average accuracy, compared to CDSGD and D-PSGD.
Related Concept Videos
Distributed Loads: Problem Solving
Associative Learning
Classical conditioning, also known...
Observational Learning
Distributed Loads
For example, consider a bookshelf filled with books stacked vertically adjacent to each other. The weight of the books is evenly distributed over the length of the shelf. As a result, the pressure at different locations on the surface of the...
Multi-input and Multi-variable systems
In the absence...
One-Degree-of-Freedom System
A one-degree-of-freedom system is defined by an independent variable that determines its state and behavior. One example of a one-degree-of-freedom system is a simple harmonic oscillator, such as a...
