Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares01:20

Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares

2.5K
A calibration curve is a plot of the instrument's response against a series of known concentrations of a substance. This curve is used to set the instrument response levels, using the substance and its concentrations as standards. Alternatively, or additionally, an equation is fitted to the calibration curve plot and subsequently used to calculate the unknown concentrations of other samples reliably.
For data that follow a straight line, the standard method for fitting is the linear...
2.5K
Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient01:10

Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient

2.5K
In a linear calibration curve, there is a value called the calibration coefficient, denoted by 'r,' which measures the strength and the direction of association between two variables. The correlation coefficient value ranges from −1 to +1. A value of +1 indicates a perfect positive linear correlation, −1 denotes a perfect negative correlation, and 0 implies no correlation between the two variables. A positive correlation value establishes that as one variable increases, the...
2.5K
Instrument Calibration01:12

Instrument Calibration

283
Instrument calibration is essential for ensuring that instruments produce accurate and consistent results. It is vital in manufacturing, healthcare, testing laboratories, and scientific research. Calibration processes are specific to each instrument and help enhance data accuracy. Each instrument has a unique calibration process tailored to its design and function to improve data accuracy.
Analytical Balance Calibration
An analytical balance measures mass and requires regular calibration to...
283

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Decreased Tissue Sodium Concentration in Suspected Prostate Cancer Detected by Internal-Reference <sup>23</sup>Na MRI: A Prospective Exploratory Study.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Discovery of gene-alcohol interaction loci influencing blood pressure in 1.1 million individuals from multiple populations.

Research square·2026
Same author

Renal Clinical Study Participants Support Data Sharing and Use of Artificial Intelligence.

Kidney international reports·2026
Same author

Disease modifying treatments for Alzheimer's disease: Clinician perspectives.

Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD·2026
Same author

Adaptive Aggregation of Monte Carlo Augmented Decomposed Filters for Efficient Group-Equivariant Convolutional Neural Network.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026
Same author

Targeting tumoral heterogeneity in lung cancer: a novel, CT-texture-guided targeted biopsy approach with exome sequencing.

NPJ precision oncology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 22, 2025

Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography
06:09

Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography

Published on: March 12, 2021

3.3K

Feature-based CBCT self-calibration for arbitrary trajectories.

Christian Tönnes1, Tom Russ2, Lothar R Schad2

  • 1Computer Assisted Clinical Medicine, Mannheim Institute for Intelligent Systems in Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1, 68159, Mannheim, BW, Germany. christian.toennes@medma.uni-heidelberg.de.

International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
|May 20, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A new algorithm, FORCASTER, self-calibrates arbitrary Cone Beam CT (CBCT) trajectories to reduce metal artifacts. It performs comparably to existing methods but offers faster runtimes and improved error tolerance.

Keywords:
AlignmentCBCTCalibrationMinimizerRegistration

More Related Videos

Automated Rat Single-Pellet Reaching with 3-Dimensional Reconstruction of Paw and Digit Trajectories
07:52

Automated Rat Single-Pellet Reaching with 3-Dimensional Reconstruction of Paw and Digit Trajectories

Published on: July 10, 2019

14.4K
An Experimental Protocol for Assessing the Performance of New Ultrasound Probes Based on CMUT Technology in Application to Brain Imaging
16:01

An Experimental Protocol for Assessing the Performance of New Ultrasound Probes Based on CMUT Technology in Application to Brain Imaging

Published on: September 24, 2017

10.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 22, 2025

Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography
06:09

Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography

Published on: March 12, 2021

3.3K
Automated Rat Single-Pellet Reaching with 3-Dimensional Reconstruction of Paw and Digit Trajectories
07:52

Automated Rat Single-Pellet Reaching with 3-Dimensional Reconstruction of Paw and Digit Trajectories

Published on: July 10, 2019

14.4K
An Experimental Protocol for Assessing the Performance of New Ultrasound Probes Based on CMUT Technology in Application to Brain Imaging
16:01

An Experimental Protocol for Assessing the Performance of New Ultrasound Probes Based on CMUT Technology in Application to Brain Imaging

Published on: September 24, 2017

10.6K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Computer Vision
  • Image Reconstruction

Background:

  • Metal artifacts significantly degrade Cone Beam CT (CBCT) image quality.
  • Accurate calibration of CBCT trajectories is crucial for artifact reduction.
  • Existing calibration methods can be computationally intensive and sensitive to initial parameter guesses.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel algorithm for self-calibrating arbitrary CBCT trajectories.
  • To reduce metal artifacts in CBCT imaging through improved trajectory calibration.
  • To decrease computational runtime by reducing optimization parameters.

Main Methods:

  • Employed feature detection (AKAZE) and brute force matching for 2D-3D projection registration.
  • Calculated translational misalignment directly from feature position discrepancies.
  • Aligned rotational parameters using a quartic function minimization approach.

Main Results:

  • The developed algorithm, FORCASTER, demonstrated performance on par with state-of-the-art methods (BFGS with NGI objective).
  • Quantitative metrics showed comparable results: nRMSE (FORCASTER: 0.3390 vs. BFGS+NGI: 0.3441), SSIM (FORCASTER: 0.83 vs. BFGS+NGI: 0.79), and Dice (FORCASTER: 0.86 vs. BFGS+NGI: 0.87).
  • FORCASTER exhibited higher tolerance to initial parameter errors in experimental noise analysis.

Conclusions:

  • The FORCASTER algorithm effectively calibrates projection orientations for arbitrary CBCT trajectories.
  • Calibration quality is comparable to existing state-of-the-art algorithms.
  • FORCASTER offers advantages in speed and robustness to initial parameter inaccuracies.