Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 22, 2025

In Silico Modeling Method for Computational Aquatic Toxicology of Endocrine Disruptors: A Software-Based Approach Using QSAR Toolbox
Published on: August 28, 2019
Development of new QSAR models for water, sediment, and soil half-life
Anna Lombardo1, Alberto Manganaro2, Jürgen Arning3
1Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Toxicology, Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCSS, Milano, Italy.
Abstract:
Checking the persistence of a chemical in the environment is extremely important. Regulations like REACH, the European one on chemicals, require the measurements or estimates of the half-life of the chemical in water, sediment, and soil. The use of non-testing methods, like quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models, is encouraged because it reduces costs and time. To our knowledge, there are very few freely available models for these properties and some are for specific chemical classes. Here, we present three new semi-quantitative models, one for each of the required environmental compartments (water, sediment, and soil). Using literature and REACH registration data, we developed three new counter-propagation artificial neural network models using the CPANNatNIC tool. We calculated the VEGA descriptors, and selected the relevant ones using an internal method in R based on the forward selection technique. The best model for each compartment was implemented in two open-source stand-alone tools, the VEGA platform, and the JANUS tool (https://www.vegahub.eu/). These models were also used by ECHA to build their PBT profiler available in the OECD QSAR toolbox (https://qsartoolbox.org/). Screening and prioritization are also our main target. The models perform well, with R2 always above 0.8 in training and validation. The only exception is the validation set of the soil compartment, with R2 0.68, that is above 0.8 only for compounds inside the applicability domain (automatically calculated by the system). The root mean square error (RMSE) is good, 0.34 or less in log units (again, for soil validation it is higher but it reaches 0.21 when considering only the compounds in the applicability domain). Compared with one of the most widely used tools, BIOWIN3, the proposed models give better results in terms of R2 and RMSE. For the classification, the performance is better for water and soil, and comparable or lower for sediment.
More Related Videos
10:05Integrated Field Lysimetry and Porewater Sampling for Evaluation of Chemical Mobility in Soils and Established Vegetation
Published on: July 4, 2014
10:29Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
Published on: May 9, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
One-Compartment Open Model for IV Bolus Administration: Estimation of Elimination Rate Constant, Half-Life and Volume of Distribution