Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

377
Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
377
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

185
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
185
Hazard Rate01:11

Hazard Rate

195
The hazard rate, also known as the hazard function or failure rate, is a statistical measure used to describe the instantaneous rate at which an event occurs, given that the event has not yet happened. From a probabilistic perspective, it represents the likelihood that a subject will experience the event in a very small time interval, conditional on surviving up to the beginning of that interval. In terms of frequency, the hazard rate can be viewed as the ratio of the number of events to the...
195
Odds Ratio01:09

Odds Ratio

284
The odds ratio (OR) is a statistical measure used extensively in epidemiology and research to quantify the strength of association between exposure and outcome across different groups. Unlike relative risk, which compares the probabilities of an event occurring, the odds ratio compares the odds of an event occurring in the exposed group to the odds of it occurring in the unexposed group. The odds, in this context, are calculated as the probability of the event happening divided by the...
284
Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

7.5K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.5K
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

62.8K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
62.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Harms of Family-Oriented Informed Consent in Clinical Practice in Two Megacities in Northern China: a Sociological and Ethical Study.

Asian bioethics review·2026
Same author

Effect of Age and Sex on Lower Extremity Power Production Capacity Throughout the Lifespan Based on 30 217 Finnish Participant Data.

Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports·2026
Same author

Scaling and self-similarity in the formation of the embryonic epigenome.

Nature physics·2026
Same author

Validity of the individualized load-velocity profile to predict one-repetition maximum on a pneumatic leg press device in adults aged 55-81 years.

Experimental gerontology·2026
Same author

Discrepancies in classification and reporting of restrictive practices (restraints, seclusion and other coercive measures) in mental health services: multi-scenario analysis of an international survey.

BJPsych open·2026
Same author

Estimating System-Wide Healthcare Costs Using a Health System Model: Application to the Thanzi La Onse Model of Malawi.

Applied health economics and health policy·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 22, 2025

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.2K

Risk-relativity is still a nonsense.

Neil John Pickering1, Giles Newton-Howes2, Simon Walker3

  • 1Bioethics Centre, Dunedin School of Medicine, Dunedin, New Zealand neil.pickering@otago.ac.nz.

Journal of Medical Ethics
|May 20, 2022
PubMed
Summary

This study argues that risk-relativity, the idea of higher competence standards for risky choices, is illogical. Even considering quality of care, arguments supporting risk-relativity remain unconvincing.

Keywords:
Decision MakingMental Competency

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K
RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans
11:09

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans

Published on: July 17, 2021

3.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 22, 2025

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.2K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K
RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans
11:09

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans

Published on: July 17, 2021

3.1K

Area of Science:

  • Philosophy of Mind
  • Decision Theory
  • Medical Ethics

Background:

  • The debate on risk-relativity questions whether competence standards for decision-making should differ based on the risk involved.
  • Gray's article explores the complexities and implications of decision-making, including the concept of quality of care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To refute the concept of risk-relativity in decision-making.
  • To analyze arguments supporting risk-relativity, particularly those invoking quality of care.

Main Methods:

  • Philosophical argumentation
  • Critical analysis of existing arguments on risk-relativity
  • Conceptual exploration of 'quality of care' in decision-making contexts.

Main Results:

  • The core argument against risk-relativity is reinforced.
  • An attempt to construct a supportive argument using 'quality of care' was found to be unpersuasive.
  • Arguments for risk-relativity, even when incorporating quality of care, do not overcome the fundamental objections.

Conclusions:

  • Risk-relativity remains a conceptually flawed notion.
  • The principle of equal competence standards for decisions, regardless of risk, is upheld.
  • Further exploration of decision-making competence should not rely on the unsupported premise of risk-relativity.