Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Contrast discrimination in noise.

G E Legge, D Kersten, A E Burgess

    Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and Image Science
    |February 1, 1987
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Extending the MNREAD sentence corpus: Computer-generated sentences for measuring visual performance in reading.

    Vision research·2019
    Same author

    The perception of cast shadows.

    Trends in cognitive sciences·2011
    Same author

    Alterations in choice behavior by manipulations of world model.

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2010
    Same author

    Associative learning of scene parameters from images.

    Applied optics·2010
    Same author

    A modified advanced Fenton process for industrial wastewater treatment.

    Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research·2007
    Same author

    Advanced Fenton processing of aqueous phenol solutions: a continuous system study including sonication effects.

    Ultrasonics sonochemistry·2007
    Same journal

    Phase retrieval with prior information.

    Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science·2008
    Same journal

    Clinical microscopy of the cornea utilizing optical sectioning and a high-numerical-aperture objective.

    Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science·1993
    Same journal

    Eye-tracking laser Doppler velocimeter stabilized in two dimensions: principle, design, and construction.

    Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science·1993
    Same journal

    Effects of aging in retinal image quality.

    Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science·1993
    Same journal

    Axial eye-length measurement by wavelength-shift interferometry.

    Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science·1993
    Same journal

    Fractal analysis of steady-state-flicker visual evoked potentials: feasibility.

    Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science·1993
    See all related articles

    Human vision is limited by internal noise and sampling efficiency. This study found that internal noise, not sampling efficiency, primarily affects contrast discrimination, offering insights into visual coding.

    Area of Science:

    • Visual perception
    • Psychophysics
    • Computational neuroscience

    Background:

    • Human contrast sensitivity is suboptimal, attributed to internal noise and sampling inefficiencies.
    • Externally added visual noise can help differentiate these factors in contrast detection.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate if similar analysis applies to contrast discrimination.
    • To determine if pedestal contrast variations are due to internal noise or sampling efficiency.

    Main Methods:

    • Measured contrast-increment thresholds across varying noise spectral densities.
    • Utilized near-threshold and suprathreshold pedestal contrasts.
    • Conducted experiments with both static and dynamic visual noise.

    Main Results:

    Related Experiment Videos

    • The analysis framework for contrast detection successfully applied to contrast discrimination.
    • Estimated internal noise levels significantly influenced contrast discrimination properties.
    • Sampling efficiency showed minimal changes in determining contrast discrimination.

    Conclusions:

    • Internal noise is the dominant factor in contrast discrimination, not sampling efficiency.
    • Findings support specific models of contrast coding in the human visual system.