Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 22, 2025

Hemocompatibility Testing of Blood-Contacting Implants in a Flow Loop Model Mimicking Human Blood Flow
Published on: March 5, 2020
Blood compatibility of widely used central venous catheters; an experimental study
Hulda Thorarinsdottir1,2, Thomas Kander3,4, Dorota Johansson5,6
1Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Insights
Central venous catheters (CVCs) impact blood cells and immune responses. A polyurethane CVC with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine showed the least favorable blood compatibility in this study.
Area of Science:
- Biomaterials Science
- Medical Device Engineering
- Immunology
Background:
- Central venous catheters (CVCs) are foreign materials that can trigger host defense mechanisms, leading to inflammation and thrombus formation.
- Understanding the blood compatibility of CVCs is crucial for patient safety and effective clinical use.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare the blood compatibility of six commonly used CVC materials.
- To identify CVC materials with more favorable hemocompatic profiles.
Main Methods:
- A modified Chandler loop model was used to test three coated and three uncoated CVC materials.
- Blood from ten healthy volunteers circulated through each catheter material for one hour.
- Blood cell counts and measurements of host defense systems (coagulation, complement, inflammatory markers) were analyzed.
Main Results:
- All tested CVC materials affected blood cells, coagulation, complement system, or inflammatory markers to varying degrees.
- A polyurethane CVC coated with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine exhibited the most unfavorable blood compatibility.
- A silicone dialysis catheter showed the greatest variability in blood compatibility across test runs.
Conclusions:
- The blood compatibility of CVCs varies significantly among different materials and coatings.
- The polyurethane CVC with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine demonstrated poor blood compatibility.
- Further clinical evaluation is needed to determine the clinical significance of these findings.
Abstract:
An inserted central venous catheter (CVC) is considered foreign material by the inert host defence systems and induce inflammation and thrombus formation. The objective of this study was to evaluate blood compatibility of six commonly used CVCs. Three coated and three uncoated CVC materials were tested in a modified Chandler loop model. Each catheter material circulated in blood from ten different healthy volunteers for 1 h. Blood cell counts and measurements of the inert host defence systems were performed on blood samples from the loop. All the tested catheters demonstrated impact on blood cells, contact coagulation, the complement system, or inflammatory markers, although the impact varied significantly. Of the catheters we evaluated, the most unfavourable blood compatibility profile was found for the polyurethane CVC coated with chlorohexidine and silver sulfadiazine. The greatest variation in blood compatibility between test runs was noted for the silicone dialysis catheter. Poor blood compatibility should be taken seriously but given the experimental design of the current study the clinical significance remains to be evaluated.
More Related Videos
08:44An In Vitro Hemodynamic Loop Model to Investigate the Hemocytocompatibility and Host Cell Activation of Vascular Medical Devices
Published on: August 21, 2020
10:15The Use of the Ex Vivo Chandler Loop Apparatus to Assess the Biocompatibility of Modified Polymeric Blood Conduits
Published on: August 20, 2014