The GETUG SEMITEP Trial: De-escalating Chemotherapy in Good-prognosis Seminoma Based on Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron

Yohann Loriot1, Matthieu Texier2, Stéphane Culine3

  • 1Gustave Roussy, Département de médecine oncologique, INSERM U981, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.

European Urology
|May 22, 2022
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

Selecting good-prognosis metastatic seminoma patients for less intensive chemotherapy using interim fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) appears feasible. This approach may reduce treatment toxicity by omitting chemotherapy cycles based on negative interim scans.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • Metastatic seminoma treatment requires strategies to minimize chemotherapy toxicity in select patients.
  • Current treatment protocols may involve intensive chemotherapy regimens with potential side effects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the feasibility of reducing chemotherapy cycles in good-prognosis metastatic seminoma.
  • To assess if negative interim fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) scans permit treatment de-escalation.

Main Methods:

  • A multicentre, phase 2, nonrandomised trial (NCT01887340) enrolled 102 patients with metastatic seminoma.
  • Patients received two cycles of etoposide-cisplatin (EP). Response was assessed via interim FDG-PET/CT.
  • Negative scans led to one cycle of carboplatin (CARBO); positive scans led to two additional EP cycles.

Main Results:

  • 68.4% of patients achieved a negative interim FDG-PET/CT and received one CARBO cycle.
  • Progression-free survival rates were comparable between the EP and CARBO groups (90.0% vs 90.8%).
  • Peripheral neuropathy and ototoxicity were significantly less frequent in the CARBO group.

Conclusions:

  • Omitting two chemotherapy cycles based on negative interim FDG-PET/CT is feasible for good-prognosis metastatic seminoma.
  • Further studies are needed due to the lack of consensus FDG-PET/CT interpretation criteria and short follow-up.
  • This strategy is not yet recommended for routine clinical integration.