Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 22, 2025

11:07
Robotic-assisted Lateral Pancreaticojejunostomy for Chronic Pancreatitis
Published on: September 5, 2025
299
Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer and Cost-Effectiveness
Youngbae Jeon1, Eun Jung Park1, Seung Hyuk Baik1
1Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery
|May 23, 2022
Summary
Robotic rectal surgery offers technical advantages for complex procedures but lacks proven oncologic superiority over laparoscopic surgery. High costs question its cost-effectiveness, necessitating further trials for widespread adoption.
Area of Science:
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
- Surgical Oncology
- Robotic Surgery
Background:
- Robotic surgery is an advanced minimally invasive technique for rectal cancer treatment.
- It has been utilized for three decades, with expanding applications due to technological advancements.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the technical benefits, oncologic outcomes, and cost-effectiveness of robotic rectal surgery compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery.
- To identify factors influencing the future development and adoption of robotic rectal surgery.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing studies comparing robotic and laparoscopic rectal surgery.
- Analysis of technical advantages, functional outcomes, oncologic results, and costs.
Main Results:
- Robotic surgery provides magnified 3D vision, improved ergonomics, and precise instrument manipulation for challenging rectal cancer procedures.
- While functional outcomes may be favorable, robotic surgery rarely demonstrates clinical or oncologic superiority over laparoscopy.
- Robotic rectal surgery incurs significantly higher costs, making its cost-effectiveness questionable.
Conclusions:
- Robotic rectal surgery offers technical advantages but requires more evidence of clinical and oncologic benefits to justify its higher cost.
- Large-scale prospective randomized trials are crucial to establish cost-effectiveness.
- Technological development and industry competition may reduce costs, potentially improving future adoption.

