Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 22, 2025

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
Published on: December 9, 2015
Estimating the COVID-19 infection fatality ratio accounting for seroreversion using statistical modelling
Nicholas F Brazeau1, Robert Verity1, Sara Jenks2
1MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis; and the Abdul Latif Jameel Institute for Disease and Emergency Analytics (J-IDEA), School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
This study introduces a Bayesian model to accurately estimate the infection fatality ratio (IFR) for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The model accounts for antibody waning and other biases, providing a more robust IFR estimate of 0.49-2.53%.
Area of Science:
- Epidemiology
- Biostatistics
- Infectious Disease Modeling
Background:
- The infection fatality ratio (IFR) is critical for assessing the burden of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
- Previous IFR estimates often failed to account for uncertainties and biases, such as antibody waning (seroreversion).
- Accurate IFR quantification requires integrating time delays (infection to seroconversion, death, seroreversion) and test performance characteristics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a robust statistical framework for estimating age-specific IFR by addressing uncertainties and biases.
- To incorporate factors like seroreversion, time delays, and test performance into IFR calculations.
- To provide a reproducible method for calculating IFR in different populations and epidemic waves.
Main Methods:
- A Bayesian statistical model was developed to integrate multiple factors influencing IFR.
- The model was applied to simulated data and ten international serologic studies.
- Consideration was given to time from infection to seroconversion, time to death, time to seroreversion, and serologic test accuracy.
Main Results:
- Seroreversion significantly impacts IFR estimates over longer time periods but is less critical in short-term, first-wave dynamics.
- Disaggregating serologic surveys by regional disease burden can refine estimates of serologic test specificity.
- The overall IFR estimates across different settings ranged from 0.49% to 2.53%.
Conclusions:
- A robust statistical framework was established to manage uncertainties in IFR parameters.
- The developed methods and code are available for application to new datasets and future epidemics.
- This approach enhances the accuracy of IFR estimation, crucial for public health response.
Related Concept Videos
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Steps in Outbreak Investigation
Relative Risk
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...

