Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 22, 2025

Controlling the Size, Shape and Stability of Supramolecular Polymers in Water
Published on: August 2, 2012
Controlling Symmetry Breaking Charge Transfer in BODIPY Pairs
Laura Estergreen1, Austin R Mencke1, Daniel E Cotton2
1Department of Chemistry, University of Southern California, Los Angeles California 90089, United States.
Abstract:
Symmetry breaking charge transfer (SBCT) is a process in which a pair of identical chromophores absorb a photon and use its energy to transfer an electron from one chromophore to the other, breaking the symmetry of the chromophore pair. This excited state phenomenon is observed in photosynthetic organisms where it enables efficient formation of separated charges that ultimately catalyze biosynthesis. SBCT has also been proposed as a means for developing photovoltaics and photocatalytic systems that operate with minimal energy loss. It is known that SBCT in both biological and artificial systems is in part made possible by the local environment in which it occurs, which can move to stabilize the asymmetric SBCT state. However, how environmental degrees of freedom act in concert with steric and structural constraints placed on a chromophore pair to dictate its ability to generate long-lived charge pairs via SBCT remain open topics of investigation.In this Account, we compare a broad series of dipyrrin dimers that are linked by distinct bridging groups to discern how the spatial separation and mutual orientation of linked chromophores and the structural flexibility of their linker each impact SBCT efficiency. Across this material set, we observe a general trend that SBCT is accelerated as the spatial separation between dimer chromophores decreases, consistent with the expectation that the electronic coupling between these units varies exponentially with their separation. However, one key observation is that the rate of charge recombination following SBCT was found to slow with decreasing interchromophore separation, rather than speed up. This stems from an enhancement of the dimer's structural rigidity due to increasing steric repulsion as the length of their linker shrinks. This rigidity further inhibits charge recombination in systems where symmetry has already enforced zero HOMO-LUMO overlap. Additionally, for the forward transfer, the active torsion is shown to increase LUMO-LUMO coupling, allowing for faster SBCT within bridging groups.By understanding trends for how rates of SBCT and charge recombination depend on a dimer's internal structure and its environment, we identify design guidelines for creating artificial systems for driving sustained light-induced charge separation. Such systems can find application in solar energy technologies and photocatalytic applications and can serve as a model for light-induced charge separation in biological systems.
More Related Videos
08:54Vibrational Spectra of a N719-Chromophore/Titania Interface from Empirical-Potential Molecular-Dynamics Simulation, Solvated by a Room Temperature Ionic Liquid
Published on: January 25, 2020
10:28Probing the Structure and Dynamics of Interfacial Water with Scanning Tunneling Microscopy and Spectroscopy
Published on: May 27, 2018
Related Concept Videos
¹H NMR: Complex Splitting
Splitting diagrams or splitting tree diagrams are routinely used to depict such complex couplings. While drawing splitting diagrams, the splitting with the larger coupling constant is usually applied...
Interpreting ¹H NMR Signal Splitting: The (n + 1) Rule
Woodward–Hoffmann Selection Rules and Microscopic Reversibility
¹H NMR: Pople Notation
A proton...
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...