Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

1.0K
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
1.0K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

4.9K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
4.9K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

1.1K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
1.1K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

912
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
912
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

83.6K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
83.6K
The Uncertainty Principle04:08

The Uncertainty Principle

25.5K
Werner Heisenberg considered the limits of how accurately one can measure properties of an electron or other microscopic particles. He determined that there is a fundamental limit to how accurately one can measure both a particle’s position and its momentum simultaneously. The more accurate the measurement of the momentum of a particle is known, the less accurate the position at that time is known and vice versa. This is what is now called the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. He...
25.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Displacement Sensing Using Bimodal Resonance in Over-Coupled Inductors.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

A Multivariate Statistical Approach to Wrinkling Detection in Composites.

IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control·2024
Same author

Finite element modelling strategy for determining directivity of thermoelastically generated laser ultrasound.

Ultrasonics·2024
Same author

Interpretable and Explainable Machine Learning for Ultrasonic Defect Sizing.

IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control·2023
Same author

Exploring the potential of using simulation games for engaging with sheep farmers about lameness recognition.

Frontiers in veterinary science·2023
Same author

Suppression of front and back surface reflections in ultrasonic analytic-signal responses from composites.

Ultrasonics·2022
Same journal

Theoretical Foundations of the Echo Envelope Statistical Modeling: A Tutorial.

IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control·2025
Same journal

Practical Demonstrations of FR3-Band Thin-Film Lithium Niobate Acoustic Filter Design.

IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control·2025
Same journal

Real-Time Heterogeneous Helical Wave Spectrum Method for Transabdominal Passive Acoustic Mapping.

IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control·2025
Same journal

Cascaded Plane Wave Ultrasound Velocity Vector Imaging: In Vivo Feasibility in Carotid Arteries.

IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control·2025
Same journal

Quantitative Acoustic Attenuation Scanning Using a Phase-Insensitive Ultrasound Computed Tomography System.

IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control·2025
Same journal

FPGA-Accelerated CNN Reconstruction for Low-Power Sparse-Array Ultrasound Imaging.

IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control·2025
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 22, 2025

Crack Monitoring in Resonance Fatigue Testing of Welded Specimens Using Digital Image Correlation
05:30

Crack Monitoring in Resonance Fatigue Testing of Welded Specimens Using Digital Image Correlation

Published on: September 29, 2019

8.4K

Uncertainty Quantification for Deep Learning in Ultrasonic Crack Characterization.

Richard J Pyle, Robert R Hughes, Amine Ait Si Ali

    IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control
    |May 23, 2022
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Uncertainty quantification (UQ) in deep learning for nondestructive evaluation (NDE) is crucial for reliable crack sizing. Deep ensembles significantly outperform Monte Carlo dropout in UQ for inline pipe inspection.

    More Related Videos

    Cortical Bone Assessment Using Ultrasonic Guided Waves: A Reproducibility Study in a Healthy Population
    09:02

    Cortical Bone Assessment Using Ultrasonic Guided Waves: A Reproducibility Study in a Healthy Population

    Published on: January 31, 2025

    676
    Ultrasonic Fatigue Testing in the Tension-Compression Mode
    06:54

    Ultrasonic Fatigue Testing in the Tension-Compression Mode

    Published on: March 7, 2018

    10.8K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Sep 22, 2025

    Crack Monitoring in Resonance Fatigue Testing of Welded Specimens Using Digital Image Correlation
    05:30

    Crack Monitoring in Resonance Fatigue Testing of Welded Specimens Using Digital Image Correlation

    Published on: September 29, 2019

    8.4K
    Cortical Bone Assessment Using Ultrasonic Guided Waves: A Reproducibility Study in a Healthy Population
    09:02

    Cortical Bone Assessment Using Ultrasonic Guided Waves: A Reproducibility Study in a Healthy Population

    Published on: January 31, 2025

    676
    Ultrasonic Fatigue Testing in the Tension-Compression Mode
    06:54

    Ultrasonic Fatigue Testing in the Tension-Compression Mode

    Published on: March 7, 2018

    10.8K

    Area of Science:

    • Nondestructive Evaluation (NDE)
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Machine Learning

    Background:

    • Deep learning (DL) shows promise for human-level data analysis in NDE.
    • Quantifying prediction uncertainty in DL for NDE is underdeveloped but essential for inspection qualification and trust.
    • This study focuses on uncertainty quantification (UQ) for deep learning models in crack sizing for inline pipe inspection.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To demonstrate optimal uncertainty quantification (UQ) methods for deep learning in crack sizing for inline pipe inspection.
    • To evaluate the performance of deep ensembles and Monte Carlo dropout for UQ in this context.

    Main Methods:

    • A convolutional neural network (CNN) was employed to size surface-breaking defects using plane wave imaging (PWI) data.
    • Two UQ methods, deep ensembles and Monte Carlo dropout, were implemented and compared.
    • The CNN was trained on PWI images of defects simulated using a hybrid finite element/ray-based model.

    Main Results:

    • Monte Carlo dropout exhibited poor UQ, with limited separation between in-distribution and out-of-distribution data and a weak correlation (R=0.84) between experimental RMSE and uncertainty.
    • Deep ensembles demonstrated improved calibration (R=0.95) and anomaly detection compared to Monte Carlo dropout.
    • Enhancements like spectral normalization and residual connections further improved deep ensemble calibration (R=0.98) and out-of-distribution detection.

    Conclusions:

    • Deep ensembles offer superior uncertainty quantification for deep learning-based crack sizing in NDE compared to Monte Carlo dropout.
    • Optimized deep ensemble architectures enhance the reliability of NDE inspections by providing trustworthy uncertainty estimates.
    • This research advances the application of trustworthy AI in critical infrastructure monitoring.