Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cochlear size variation in a large-scale international multicentre cohort.

Hearing research·2026
Same author

Various Surgical Techniques for Cochlear Implantation in an Ossified Cochlea: A Systematic Review.

The journal of international advanced otology·2026
Same author

Capsid-engineered AAV vector overcomes a key intracellular barrier and efficiently transduces spiral ganglion neurons in adult mice.

Molecular therapy. Advances·2026
Same author

Exploring Anatomy-Based Fitting for Cochlear Implantation: A Narrative Review.

Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale·2026
Same author

Surgical Approaches and Complications in OSIA: a Systematic Review.

European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery·2026
Same author

Severe and profound hearing loss in patients with multiple sensory impairments: increased incidence of cognitive impairment.

Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 22, 2025

Performing Intracochlear Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implantation
09:10

Performing Intracochlear Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implantation

Published on: March 8, 2022

4.5K

Worldwide Variation in Cochlear Implant Candidacy.

Paul Van de Heyning1, Javier Gavilán2, Benoît Godey3

  • 1Department of ENT, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp Belgium.

The Journal of International Advanced Otology
|May 24, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Cochlear implantation candidacy criteria differ globally. Bilateral and single-sided deafness cochlear implantations are increasing, necessitating standardized outcome measures for broader access to hearing solutions.

More Related Videos

Enhancing Electrode Location Assessment in Cochlear Implantation via Computed Tomography Image Fusion
03:58

Enhancing Electrode Location Assessment in Cochlear Implantation via Computed Tomography Image Fusion

Published on: January 17, 2025

542
Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

475

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 22, 2025

Performing Intracochlear Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implantation
09:10

Performing Intracochlear Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implantation

Published on: March 8, 2022

4.5K
Enhancing Electrode Location Assessment in Cochlear Implantation via Computed Tomography Image Fusion
03:58

Enhancing Electrode Location Assessment in Cochlear Implantation via Computed Tomography Image Fusion

Published on: January 17, 2025

542
Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

475

Area of Science:

  • Audiology
  • Otolaryngology
  • Medical Device Technology

Background:

  • Global variations in cochlear implantation candidacy criteria exist.
  • Understanding these differences is crucial for equitable access to hearing restoration technologies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the evolution and current state of candidacy criteria for cochlear implantation worldwide.
  • To investigate variations in outcome measurements across different audiology clinics.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of candidacy criteria and outcome measurements from 19 HEARRING clinics.
  • Comparative study of clinical practices in cochlear implantation.

Main Results:

  • Significant variability in candidacy criteria was observed among the analyzed clinics.
  • Increasing trends in bilateral cochlear implantation and implantation for single-sided deafness were identified.

Conclusions:

  • Standardized outcome measurement instruments are essential for cochlear implantation.
  • Implementation of standardized measures will improve access to hearing solutions for all eligible patients.